The Four Spiritual Laws - Flash

A series of experiments using CERN's lead beam have presented compelling evidence for the existence of a new state of quark-gluon matter in which quarks, instead of being bound up into more complex particles such as protons and neutrons, are liberated to roam freely. Theory predicts that this state must have existed just a few microseconds after the Big Bang, before the formation of matter as we know it today, but until now this had not been tested experimentally. Physicists at CERN recreated those conditions by smashing lead nuclei into each other, to reach temperatures over 100 000 times as hot as the centre of the sun, and energy densities twenty times that of ordinary nuclear matter. For further information, please read on...
1. INTRODUCTION
What are quarks?

Welcome to the weird and wonderful world of quarks! As far as we know, they are the tiniest components from which much of matter is made. All of our theories about matter rest on the assumption that many particles, for example the protons and neutrons that we find inside atoms, are actually made up of quarks. But nobody has succeeded in isolating a quark. We think that normally they are so tightly bound up inside other that it is impossible for them to break free and exist independently.

But our theories also say that our universe was created 12-15 billion years ago in a massive explosion that we call the Big Bang. A tiny fraction of a second after this Big Bang, when the temperature and concentration of energy were immensely high, we believe that all of the quarks must have existed freely in a kind of soup, before clumping together and condensing into the kinds of particles we know today as the universe expanded and cooled (rather like steam condensing into water droplets).

While nobody had ever observed free quarks, let alone their transformation into ordinary matter, this fascinating story remained just a theory, albeit a very strong one. So here at CERN, a programme was launched to try to recreate the conditions that existed immediately after the Big Bang (a project affectionately known as the "Little Bang") to see whether we could make free quarks, and watch their transition into complex particles as the system cooled. To follow this story we need to know a little more about these enigmatic characters called quarks.
A bit of history

Before 1955, nobody had ever heard of quarks. We thought that atoms were simply made up of protons, neutrons and electrons, and that these were the simplest components of matter you could get. Then Gell-Mann and Zweig proposed their theory of quarks. He got the name from James Joyce's book "Finnegans Wake", and pronounced it to rhyme with "pork", rather than "park". Particles made up of quarks are called hadrons (there are also other particles called leptons, for example electrons, which have no internal structure). There are two different types of hadrons - baryons, such as protons or neutrons, are composed of three quarks, while other particles called mesons are made of a quark and an anti-quark. Up until 1974, we could explain all the hadrons we knew about by various combinations of three different types of quarks, called up, down and strange. All hadrons had a logical explanation and all of the expected combinations were known, apart from one - three strange quarks. Gell-Mann predicted that this combination must exist, although it had never been seen, and he called it the Omega baryon. When the Omega was subsequently discovered in 1964, this pretty much convinced everyone that quarks really did exist.

In 1974, a new particle called the J-psi was discovered. This gave theoreticians some work to do, but they quickly explained that this was a meson made from a new kind of quark, which they called charm. A few years later, a fifth quark was discovered, called bottom and in 1995, a sixth, called top. And that's it, as far as we know!
Recreating the Big Bang

But how to generate temperatures and energies high enough to release these quarks from their hadron cages? Physicists at CERN do it by smashing heavy ions together as hard and fast as they can. The heavier the ions are, the greater the energy that is released in the crash. The ions of choice are lead, their atomic weight is a hefty 208 and they collide at energies around 3.5 TeV. Large amounts of energy are squeezed into a very small space (a high "energy density. This frees the quarks (and the particles which carry the strong force, called gluons) into a "quark-gluon plasma". The resulting fireball is like a hot gas at high pressure. It rapidly explodes, simultaneously expanding and cooling. As the tiny inferno cools, the quarks condense into hadrons (a process known as "hadronisation"). These hadrons continue to interact with each other for as long as the particle density is high enough. But these interactions, mediated by the strong force, occur only at very short range. As further expansion occurs, these interactions cease, and the particles that are left survive to travel onwards and outwards towards the detectors, which are placed all around.

The CERN lead beam programme was opened in 1994. It consists of several specially built systems, for example a new linear accelerator, as well as pre-existing, interconnected accelerators (the Booster synchrotron, the Proton Synchrotron and the Super Proton Synchrotron), which were upgraded for the project. Seven large experiments were involved, measuring different aspects of lead-lead and also lead-gold collisions. They were codenamed NA44, NA45, NA49, NA50, NA52, NA57 and WA98. The project is a feat of collaboration as well as engineering - scientists from institutes in almost twenty countries are participating in the experiments, including Italy, Germany, France, Russia, Finland, Poland, Greece and the US. Due to specialised nature of the programme, building the machinery for producing the lead ion beam involved an international collaboration.
Looking for quarks

How does one recognise quark-gluon plasma? And what do the physicists want to know about it? One thing they want to measure is the critical temperature (called To) and energy density (Eo) which are needed for quark-gluon plasma to form. They have calculated these from theory (To is predicted to be 150-200 MeV, or 1000 times the temperature at the centre of the sun, and Eo is predicted to be 1 GeV/fm3, or seven times the energy density of normal nuclear matter) but they want to check if particles really do melt under these conditions. The problem is that the physicists can only see the particles that escape from the fireball and reach their detectors. From these signals they have to reconstruct what happened before, to work out whether the quarks and gluons were produced in a dense enough state to form a free plasma. The experiments were all optimised for measuring different signals which might indicate if and how a quark-gluon plasma was formed. Some of them optimised their detectors for one rare signal, while others developed multipurpose detectors which were sensitive to multiple signals.
2. PIECES OF A PUZZLE
The direct approach

The only way to "see" the quarks directly is to detect the electromagnetic radiation which they emit. This radiation is in the form of photons. Unfortunately there are also many other processes which can produce photons, so there is a huge amount of background noise. One experiment was looking for these photons, but the overwhelming background made it hard to detect a clear signal. An enhancement of the number of photons was seen at high energies, but we cannot yet be absolutely certain that it originated from free quarks. But what the experiment did do was establish an upper limit on the photons that could be coming from the quarks. This means that they could explain at least 95% of the photons they saw by background processes alone, but up to 5% could have been coming from free quarks.

However 99.9% of the particles reaching the detectors from the lead ion collisions are hadrons, particles made of quarks. By definition these particles must have been formed after the quarks had already condensed, and the quark-gluon plasma no longer existed. But although these particles don't allow us to see the quark-gluon plasma directly, perhaps they can allow us to work backwards to deduce what must have been happening beforehand.
Full of charm - the J-psi

An important predicted signature of free quarks involves a particle called the J-psi. J-psis are made of a charm quark and a charm anti-quark. They are rare because charm quarks are very heavy, and can only be produced at the very first stages immediately after the collision, while the constituents of the nuclei still have their full energy. However the formation of J-psis would be suppressed by the presence of quark gluon matter,so a strong reduction in the number of J-psis leaving the fireball suggests that hot quark-gluon plasma was made in the initial stages of the collision. Sure enough, this is exactly what the physicists saw.
Greek characters

There are other kinds of so-called "vector mesons" called phi, rho zero and omega, which can also tell us some intriguing things. Like the J-psi, they can decay into lepton pairs (for example an electron and a positron, or a muon and an antimuon). If we draw a graph of the number of lepton pairs we see at different lepton pair masses, we end up with a peak for each different kind of vector meson. Usually the rho zeros form a wide peak, with a sharp peak from the omega meson on top. But in these high energy collisions we see no rho zero peak at all, only a broad smear. What the physicists think is happening here is that the rho zeros are being formed and decay while the hadrons are still interacting with each other. The short time between collisions does not give them a chance to develop into a state with a well-defined mass, hence the smearing. In other words, the graph acts as a snapshot of the collision stage directly after the liberated quarks have condensed, but well before the hadrons have stopped interacting.
Something strange

When analysing the abundancies of the hadrons emerging from the nucleus-nucleus collision, a peculiar feature was observed which strongly distinguishes such collisions from collisions of light particles such as protons or electrons, both at the same and at much higher energies. The original lead ions only contain up and down quarks, there are no strange quarks. We can look at the particles coming out of the collisions and ask how many strange quarks and antiquarks are formed relative to the newly produced up and down quarks and antiquarks. For proton-proton or electron-positron collisions, the fraction of extra strange quarks made is 0.2. This stays the same however much you increase the energy. But for the nucleus-nucleus collisions, the fraction is twice as high, at 0.4. This is what is meant by the fantastic phrase "global strangeness enhancement by a factor of two"! The point is that we know from detailed calculations that once hadrons have been formed, essentially no more strange quarks can be made. So most of these extra strange quarks must have been created before the hadrons were made, ie in a quark-gluon plasma. These extra strange quarks are mostly reflected by an increased production of the very rare particles that contain two or three strange quarks (for example the Omega baryon, whose numbers are increased by up to 15 times), rather than in the generally more common particles that only contain one. This again hints that the "extra strangeness" was formed before the hadrons themselves, and is the other central prediction for the formation of a quark-gluon plasma.
Signatures of chaos

If we look at the particles leaving the fireball, they retain signatures of their recent past. We can use these signatures to work backwards in time, to discover clues about the transition from quarks into ordinary matter. The hadrons that escape and reach the detectors are fixed, in terms of their identity and their momentum. But we can run the film back to the point where the system was dense enough for the particles to be colliding, and bouncing off each other. These are the type of collisions which billiard balls undergo, the identity of the particles does not change, but their momentum does. As the fireball expands, the energy density decreases until the hadrons no longer interact. Their momenta "freeze out", and are fixed from that moment on. So when we look at the momenta of the different particles leaving the fireball, their distribution acts as a memory or snapshot of the conditions when this freeze out occured. We can use the momentum distrubution of the emerging particles to calculate the temperature at which this occurred, it works out to about 100 MeV. We can also calculate that at this point the fireball was expanding at an enormous rate, at over half the speed of light!

But we are interested in what happened even earlier, when the fireball was much hotter and denser, and the quarks were condensing into hadrons. After the hadrons have emerged from coalescing quarks, the system is simply no longer dense enough for the hadrons to interact in this way. The finally measured particle composition is therefore fixed, right at the point of hadronization! We can then use the distribution of the numbers of different types of particles to calculate the temperature at which the transition of quarks to hadrons occurred. It works out to around 180 MeV, which agrees with the critical temperature as predicted by theory.
Particles in pairs

Another technique called Bose-Einstein Interferometry is used to look at pairs of particles. It allows us to measure the final size of the system. We already know how rapidly the system expands, so once we know how big it is, we can use the information to extrapolate backwards and work out the original energy density. It works out at two to four times the theoretically predicted value of Eo, the critical energy density for quark liberation. The initial energy density in the collisions was thus plenty for the formation of quark-gluon plasma, according to theory.
3. THE FINAL PICTURE

Our picture of quark-gluon plasma therefore resembles a jigsaw puzzle, with many pieces provided by the different experiments. We need all the experiments working in concert to have a complete picture, and to check that all the pieces agree and fit together. There is one important piece still missing, the photon signal that would allow us to "see" the free quarks directly. But we have enough other pieces to be fairly certain of what is happening. It is possible to think up alternative explanations for the individual results, but there is no known theory apart from quark-gluon plasma that can explain all of the results together. Therefore although the evidence is circumstantial, we are confident that it is compelling enough to say that we have formed a new state of matter, in which quarks and gluons are "deconfined".

We have recreated matter in a state we have never seen before, at energy densities twenty times higher than that inside the atomic nucleus. The same conditions have only existed in the first few microseconds after the Big Bang (comparable energy densities, although at much lower temperatures, may also exist in the centre of neutron stars). Our understanding about how the universe was created, which was previously unverified theory for any time point before the formation of ordinary atomic nuclei (about three minutes after the Big Bang), has now been experimentally tested back to a point only a few microseconds after the Big Bang, the time at which we believe the hadrons making up those nuclei were created. Going back further will involve new challenges, which future experiments at CERN's new LHC and also at RHIC at Brookhaven, will address.

TRANSLATION

Translation

Sunday, February 21, 2010
BLOG THE BOOK 2
If as I believe my thoery is true and it will be accepted by one compentant judge it will be a considerable step in science.Charles Darwin............No that I say Darwinism is right just that I think this quote applies equally to a thoery of ex-nihilo creation.
My theory of everything for WASP..
Steve Jeffreys collary to the law of non contradiction.
Opposite particles X and Y cannot be in the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME in the SAME PLACE THE EXCEPTION PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG...
FOUR STATES ARE ONE PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG AND THE FOUR FORCES DEPEND ON THE FOUR STATES SO THEY ARE ALSO ONE.
E=MC^2 depends on momentum an momentum is determined by state.
This is a means for a Big crunch to store the potential energy of a prexisting universe and release it as Kinetic energy in the big bang.
The mechanism is super critical non newtoinan fluids or four states of matter in one.....................
This give you a mechanism for the big bang you can use WASP To calculate the potential energy of the prexisting universe and the kinetic energy of the big bang.
You asked me to give you a thoery it is simplified it does not include determinism.
Determinism in the early universe maks it too complicated.Suffice to say qantum effects did not kick in until after the Big Bang everything prior to that was determinism rather than randomness.
The reason being is as you go back in time order or reverse entropy increases and becomes infinite.
I can argue there is no need for God but I don't want to.
And that is the characteristic of every true believer they want to believe.
Steve.

The universal energy equation is 2+2=4 Over a cycle the big bang and the big crunch have to balance 2+2=4.
But due to thermodynamics a little energy is lost with each cycle like a bouncing ball.
And to balance 2+2 so that it equals four we have to increase mass as it goes backward in time.
So that with infinite time we have infinite mass.Which EInstein said was a dealbreaker.............
Infinite mass is an impossibility.
And since it is the only way to make 2+2=4 balance.
Then there is another way that is for energy to be fetched like a bucket of water from dimension X nihilo.
Creative energy is fetched from ex-nihilo making the big bang balance for the universal energy equation 2+2=4.

Einsteins second equation for mass approaching the speed of light includes momentum.
And momentum is determined by state so when four states are one E=MC^2 is a different equation for prior to the big bang.

The universe doesn't balance it cannnot balance because it is an impossibility for mass to increase as you go backward in time.
Until it becomes an infinite mass universe..............
That means 2+2 does not equal four for the big bang.......The difference from four can be axactly calculated.............
And equations don't balance for 2+2=4 E=MC^2 doesn't balance for 2+2=4.
And maybe this is an atrifact of the original non balancing equation for energy...................
Of course there are three alternatives creaton exnihilo where the equation balances with energy from outside the universe.
A balanced universe where mass increases with energy lost from the bouncing ball.
An unbalanced universe where energy is lost but is not replaced...............
And for my money it is an unbalanced universe.
And that would be a bad bet.
But if you want to believe 2+2 does not equal four for the energy of the universe.
Then it is a good bet for an evolutionist.
That all equations should not balance but need an adjustment.
To get a thoery of everything.
So go ahead adjust 2+2=4 to agree with the universe.
And see if all equations make sense in one big unbalanced theory of everything.http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/bounce/energy.html

2+2=4 does not balance for 2 bounces+ 2 bounces= 4 Bounces.
Because energy is lost as heat.
Hence the ball eventually stops bouncing.
We can apply this to the occillatng universe theory....................
for 2+2=4 for the cycles of the universe big crunch big bang.Mass has to increase as you go backward in time..........
And with time that goes on forever there has to be infinite mass..
You have to start with 100% mass.
And it will eventually reach zero......................If the equation balances.

Two answers for everything can't be right because the bible said that two is the number of enmity with God.
So it could hardly be the answer to everything.
So it muts be possible to add two answers in 1/3s to get one answer.............
1/3 YING+ 1/3 YANG+ 1/3 YANG= 1
There is nothing wrong with the 1/3rd equation except that it makes two equations one.
And sometimes this is juts not possible. QM AND GR will work in tandem 2+2=4 for all but a few equations involvng the graviton.....................
Maybe it is possible to use the third equation to unify even these equatons involving the graviton into one equation for everything.
1/3 STRING THEORY+ 1/3 QM+ 1/3 GR= 1
This makes the three major thoeries not three seperate theories but one super theory.
Steve.

A model is a good model if it.
1. is elgant.
2.Contains few artbitrary or adjustable elements.
3. Agrees with and explains all existing observations.(including inflation)
4. Makes details predictions about future observations that can disprove or falsify the model if they are not borne out.

Hawkings model of 10^500 different universes with different laws cannot be observed so only one universe can be observed which my thoery explains adequately.
A particle such as a primordial atom cannot both be born and die at the same time without having a half life.
The particle started out as four states in one and it muts have started out as four states which became one in the big crunch.The thoery is when four states are one four forces also unify.Thus potential energy of the big crunch is converted into kintetic energy of the big bang.Or potential energy ex-nihilo creates one state of matter that is four states in one.That is the description of the primordial atom.
And in the big bang since there is no time it dies before it is born the concepts birth and death of the particle and half life have no meaning and are all mixed togther.

Time is mised togther past presnet and future.
Time must have existed from the very begining.
The paricle reaches a point whee times arror begins where it cannot go back and do it all over again
It can't go back to it's state of non existance it has to live and therefore it has to die.
There is a point where it can still return to the void from which it came............

It is TESTABLE because there is a point where the four states are two states in one.
And where they are four states in one 2+2=4.
/4=1
Gravity then reverses and becomes a superforce.
The direction of gravity can change back for a time then it becomes critical and it reaches the point where it cannot go back to the previous four states without an explosion of the primodordial particle.
Time in this case is the direction of gravitys arrow and time runs backwards beyond this point to the big crunch.
The blog is great.
And I really like it.
It is so good that I will end it right here.
And it has only just begun.
Because it one mans seearch for everything.
And it is a blog book and it can be as long as I want it to be.
Or as short as I would like it to be.
And that is as short as it is already.
Because I already have a blog book.
And my blog was deleted.
And there is no point in writing a blog if it gets deleted.
And maybe I could fin it on some disc.
But Jessu doesn't want a parrot I can always start another blog.
And it will be juts as good.
But people will always encroach upon my style.
They will always say he has no sense of appropriateness.
And I cannot even spell it.
And my grammer is bad it is just so utterly boring.
And that is intelligent design it is so boring I don't even want tgo think about it.
It is so utterly boring.
And that is what my blog is.
It is utterly and completely boring.
Without a little help from jesus.
He is my rock.
And he is my fortress.
In Him will I trust.
And I don't need to be a parrot anymore adn think that that is what God wants from me just someone to write books.
Gods gift is for my love and my pleasure is to help one I love.
And God helps me to help myself.
And that is a great thing.
Because if anyone knows he exists I do yet I waste my time chasning rainbows.
That is what a thoery of everything really is.
It is chasing ghosts or windmills it is a glorious and futile quest.
God has already told us it came out of nothing.
And ex-nihilo is a satisfactory explaination for how the universe began.
And they don't like it because they believe in the big bang.
And they don't.
And I'm not sure that the big bang is what the bible means when it says ex-nihilo.
I'm pretty sure the problems with the big bang as as big as making something out of nothing with noone in charge.
And if you ever tried to make something with no one in charge you will know you don't get anything worthwhile.
You need a teacher to help you to make something.
Otherwise you just get a footstool for someones foot.
That is not very good.
And it is great if you have done it yourself.
And that is what this blog is all about I have done it myself with a little help from the Lord.
And it has been like a parrot and it has been like a footstool.
It is has been my own work.
ANd God helped me to think clearly about the big bang.
And no one ever thinks clearly about it.
And my heor is John hartnett who thnks clearly about everything.
He thinks about whether the bible is true.
And if it is is true how does that effect the thoery.
And his book about the big bang is just about the best book I have ever read.
Except for Hawkings when he believed there was a God.
But his latest book is juts bable.
bable to 10^500th power that is how much nonsense it takes to make a multiverse.
And thi skind of nonsense is what my computer porgram produces.
So I have succeeded in physics but not as I have hoped I have shown string thoery to be nonsense and not the answer to heaven and hell.
Because there is limbo and that makes 4 dimensions + 3 and that is 7.
And that is a good thoery because it agrees with all the observations.
And it is elegant.
And above all this blog is elegant.
It is a thoery of everything in a nutshell.
It is consise and doesn't contain ambigiuities.
Stating it simply and explaining everything is what science does.
It is occams rasor.If it is the simplist explaination it is probably right.
And that is why science is always wrong.
Because the simplist explaination is that God did it.
And He wants to show us how to work it out.
And He doesn't.
He wants us to have faith faith is all the proof we need.
And after examining the big bang cross examining the witnesses it is clear that they are blind dumb and stupid and that they have seen nothing.
And that the bible when it is sais nothing.
Means someone.
Not something.
We just may leave it there.We won't be a parrot.But we will will use this blog to explain our theory of everything.The circular dimensions include time.
And to convert four into three you use my time formula which converts 0 eccentricity into 0.02..............
And my forumula is very accurate within six minutes per year of sidereal time...................
So converting string theory is a matter of converting a circular orbit of 360 days in ten dimensions to an eliptical orbit of 365 days and three dimensions.....................
Then you can put string theory together with Einsteins like twister theory.
Draw a 360 day circular earth orbit in 10 dimensions with an eccentricity of zero convert to an eccentricty of 0.002 using my time formula.
Then the ten dimenesions will be expressed in three dimensions.
The devil doesn't want God to make it right.
And God can take any lemon and make lemonaide.
And God can take any situation and make it right.
And faith without work is dead and it was never intended to discourage.
But it be a sawhorse that if you don't have work you can't make a difference.
And of course you can do whatever comes to hand.
And whatever you find that you are good at you should do with all of your heart.
And if you find anything to do.
You should just quit.
And that isn't life to give up.
There is always something to do that matters.
Like blogging which does not matter even a little bit.
If I blog or don't blog life goes much the same.
And life always goes better with a blog.
I searched for everything and I found a theory of everything.
But it did not go to plan.
I expected others would share my passion.
And that they would take an interest in what I was doing.
They did not share my passion and they did not take an interest.
So what is the point of telling the world in a blog.
How dissapointed Iam.
Iam dissapointed that no one understands.
And I should not expect anyone to understand my blog because I speak in tongues.
And I might speak my heavenly fathers own language.
And it makes no sense to unbelievers.
And that means to born again christians because they don't understand tongues anymore than anyone else.
Tongues of angels and they don't understand my lack of love.
And if they had been alone for all these years they would understand.
As God understands that lonelyness is hard to overcome.
Because the lonely don't make good friends.
And other people ar lonely and they want someone to be their friend.
But you have to want more than just a friend.
And life is like that you have to be interested in more than one thing.
And Iam only interested in little things.
That interest me.
And that is just the way Iam.
I like one little thing and not a lot of things.
But I could try to like other things but then there would not be time for the things that interest me.
And there is all the time in the world for the things Iam interested in.
But no time for anything that is outside my little universe.
1/ Einsetins dice can make QM and GR one by unifying classical theories like Maxwells and EInsteins with QM.Making randomness orderely
2/ 2+2=4 program produces one equation for everything.
3/ Clock equation makes 10 dimensions 3 dimensions.
The hope of doing somethign that matters is just a hope.
But it keeps people from unhappiness.
And it kept me bored and unhappy.
So what is hope is it hope for the future.
or is it hope for the present.
We can hope that here is something for us right now.
Rather than hope for something in the future that never will come to pass.
They say that girls were wrong to play ping pong and they didn't know that they were chineese girls and everything in the chineese language is reversed is reversed.
And that means we can convert Einsteins theory of eliptical orbits of the earth into a circular orbit of ten dimensions effectiviely converting Eintein to string and back again.
And this Steves most excellent fudge.
And clock is a memorial stones to the God is Israel who proved hawking wrong for the final time.
And there is no hawking.
Because there is a God of israel.
And the God of israel has declared war on Stephen hawking.
And it is the other way around.
God still loves Stephen and has done everything to make his life better.
And he is not grateful instead he blames God for his sickness.
And he has never said that God is to blame.
But he feels hurt that God has not made him better.
And maybe one day it will be nnot as Stephen haking Hopes.
Because life can be like that.
It can be not as we have hoped but we still succeed we still overcome.
And Hawking has to accept that it will be not as he had hoped but it be even better.
because it may be better than he had hoped.
New technolgy may mean he can control his computer with his mind.
And he may not be finished with his books.
It may be not as God hoped for the next one one to prove 2+2=4 right.
Becaus ehis next one will prove God wrong.
And if it does prove God right that it will be not as Hawking had hoped.
But he can't deny the evidence.
And that is exactly what I hope that the evidence form my computer program is so convincing that even Hawking will admit there is a God.
And my thoery o converting a ten dimnsional circle into an elipse.
Is impossible and if it is imnpossible then my clcok doesn't make sense.
And that is quite possible that my clock is not more accurate than sidereal time.
But six minutes out.
and if it is out it is not a conversion of a circle into an elipse.
But if it is not out then the six minutes is significant.
ANd makes a difference when you convert a ten dimesionsional circle into a 3 dimensional elipse.
But it is imossible M theory is impossible and it might because you CANNOT convert Ten dimensions into three.
If you could then Einstein could be converted into ten dimesions.
And that would be just as I had hoped.
That it is impossible.
And it might not be I might have hoped M theory could make sense in four dimensions.
being a fan of twister theory at least I know what I like.
And four dimensions is what I like...........
I don't like ten I can't understand ten so I don't believe they exist I cannot observe them therefore they are not science.
I can observe four dimensions of an eliptical orbit.
And all of the orbits in other universes must be circular.
And if they are then the other universes are unstable and will fall apart.
But they must be circular if they contain more than three dimesions.
And hawking has not thought this through.
And I have on his behalf.
We can convert one dimension and that is time.
Time can be in ten dimensions and it is still 360 days.
But if the orbit is unstable the number of days is not the same.
And when we convert it to an elipse it is an orbit which never could exist
If we convert the nine other dimenisons from circular to eliptical then we would be cooking with gas.
We wuold have the formula to convert Einsteins thoery to string theory and back again.
But we ccan't convert none dimesions like we can the one dimension of time.
Time really can be converted from circular to eliptical the number of degrees equals the number of days.
And this orbit in unstable and it might be a much more stable orbit than the earth is actually in.
Because it is perfect.
Whereas the earths orbit involves a wobble.
Which may not always have existed before the flood.
Th eearth is tilted if it were not tiled maybe my clock would be 100% accurate.
Because it is a theoretical perfect elipse based on a prefect circular orbit.
And it measn nothing.And it just might mean everything.
The fact that it is so close to sidereal time.And that is just a coincidence.
But if you getvthe right answer any other time is it a coicidence or is your working right.I think my working is right.
And if it is a coersion of time then it is alos a conversion of space.
That is one thing that is very clear baout converting a circle into an elipse it is converting time and space.
So it is converting dimension as well.
If the circular dimension is more than three then converting to an elipse will convert it to three.
And it must be some kind of mistake or an impossibility.
And maybe converting dimesions form ten to three is impossible.
And it might totally as easy as jujst converting time.
That may convert space as well.
Then my clock is a thoery of everything.
And that is what the clock always has been Newtons theory of everything.
And Newton is dead but he still speaks through the clock.
Because this kind of orbit was his idea.
And it goes back to another man.
Who lived a long time ago.
Becaus eorbits have been calculated from the year dot.
And they have been converted from before time itself.
So it not going to lead to a time machine.
There I ahve said it now it is not going to happen.
And I could take that attitude that be mentioning that you convert then dimensions to three that means you can travel through other dimensions.
And it might mean just that.
If man were that clever that he could figure out how to travel through time/space.
And if he is meant to travel faster than light then one day someone will come ujp with a better theory about how to do it.
But my theory is just to convert dimensions on paper.
And it is a map.
of the universe.
And iof ten dimesions are unstable then the eleipse genereated from an unstable circular orbit will also be unstable.
And an elipse is not an unstable orbit.
But it can be wrong.
But a perfect orbit cannot really exist.So it is only a hyothetical.
And it is a really good fusge.
Because there a better way to convert a circle into an elipse and that is eccentricity.
And if it works why hasn't someone thought about it before.
No one has because you can't convert a perfect circle into a perfect elipse.
And you can't convert a perfect circle into an imperfect elipse.
It is all about perfection myt time equation is 100% right.
Where the earths orbit is slightly wrong.
And the earth orbit must be right just the way it is.
Then my clock is six minutes out and the six minutes will be shown to be an important calculation taht has to do with imperfection.
Because the earth will be more perfect that a conversion of a circle into an elipse.
Perhaps it is ID that six minutes it is necessary on a bike that is a bell.
ANd is that six minuets necessary in earths orbit it sure is necessary.
So if the clock is wrong there is not much point is trying to convert space as well as time.
Because it will give the right answer for space.
And nothing could be closer to the truth.
It may not be the right answer for the earth but it will be the rigth answer for time/space.....
Take the clock and shove it.
I would if it knew where to put it because it doesn't suit the mantle of any university.
They don't want to know about a bible Pi clock because you can't use Pi or the bible to calculate time.
let alone both.
And it is both and it is right.The earth may have had a circular orbit in the begining which dcayes into an eliptical one.
And that is very possible if you know what you are talking about.
because the more you know about orbits the better off you would be.
But a circular orbit cannot decay into an elipse.
And if it can why can't it be true.
That the earth started about at 360 days in duration.
So we have five days difference and that is not six minutes.
But you can convert a circular orbit into an elipse.
And that is just it.
You can.
Now at the begining of the 21st century faced with scienitfic claims like neo-Darwinism and the multiverse (many universes) hypothesis in cosmology invented to avoid the overwhelming evidence for puprose and design found inmodern science the Catholic Church will again defend human nature by proclaiming the the immanent deisgn in nature is real Archbishop of Vienna.Quote fromHawkings book page 163.
The book is finished.
And it really is.
I have no more to say about the subject.
And Iam going to end the book.
Because a blog book does not need to bevery long.
It can be very interesting.
If it is kept short.
And the best thing about my blog book is everything I have written.
Because ntohing that I have written has been greater than a blog.
And everything I have written has just been the greater gift of blogging.
And everythig is right about blogging.
It means the glory goes to God.
And everybody who reads this blog shall enjoy it.
A unstable circular orbit in ten dimensions can be covnerted to a stable eliptical orbit in three dimensions.
If as the experts believe this equation is not reversible and Einsteins four dimensions of space time cannot be converted to ten.
Then string theory is proved wrong by the law of reversibility a thoery has to work in reverse for it to work at all.
Correct me if Iam wrong but I think this is like Jesus is the way the truth and the life something undeniable.
This proves the multiverse wrong also that hawking believes in instead of God.
Because it requires ten spacial dimensions to work.

ALexander hardigan had lost emma he no longer cared about life.
And that is what you have to be like to try to build a time machine.You have tyo be tired of living.
And alexander knew the patent clerk.
And he had an equation E=MC^2.
And that was in three dimesions.So he thought of adding a fourth dimension time.
And then reversing the equation for conversion of a circular 360 day orbit of the earth to an eliptical 365 day orbit.
Where the circular orbit is in higher dimesions and unstable.
But when it is converted to an eliptical orbit it is stable.
And it is instabilty which makes time travel possible.
Now it is aload of twaddle but we have to make a movie and we have to have stuff on a blackboard.
So ALex doesn't define time like Einsteins but as an eliptical orbit using Newtons equations.
Because time is absolute and he has a clock that proves this.
And that is is what movies are all about.
The scientist has a clock that proves you can travel in time.
ANd of course it proves the opposite.
So he has to reverse the equations so he can reverse time.
I need not have worrried I can't stop anyone from building a time machine and I can't help themdo it either.
If they built it by it'svery nature it would be something that is meant to be and could not be changed before the fect.
Because causualty would be in the future and it would strech back to when that phone call was smade.
And nothing could cause the phone call to not be made.
Except ereasing Alexs blackboard.
And so very serious Alex has a blackboard with pictures of an eliptical orbit and a circular orbit in ten dimensions.And has equations that convert ten dimesions of time/space to four dimensions.
And it is nonsense.
And it really might be nonsense just somehting I thought up to go along with the clock.
The clock must prove something.
And it might as well prove it all.
And anything thta is a little toe can prove it all.
Einsteins dice can prove it all Alexander could have had Einsteins dice.
And they obey classical rules like 1 ODD THROW+1 EVEN THROW= 2 ODD THROWS.
and 2 ODD THROWS+2 EVEN THROWS=4 EVEN THROWS.
And this unifies quantum mechnanics randomness with Einsteins order.
And thus you can predict the future of particles.
And if you can predict the future maybe you can travel into it.
And that is what Alexander put on the blackboard.........
and it is just for fun and it is not fun that is when it gets crazy when it is no longer fun to go back.
When it an obessession with changing something like Emmas death.
Then it very dark.
And it is a question about why he can't change it.
And the Morlock gave the answer that in the future he had with emma it was another universe where the timemachine did not exist.
So the timemachine caused emmas death.
and that is as positive as you can be about time travel it will cause the very thing you are trying so hard to prevent.
And that is negative.
It will change something but what is it that you are going to change.
is it the whole thing.
Or is is just emmas death.

Alex hardigan added two circular orbits in ten dimesions to two eliptical orbits in three dimension and got four dimensions.
he got an extra dimension which is time.
And nobody cna answer the question what was on ALexs Blackboard becaus eno one can actually travel through time.
I will reserve my judgement on the quantum telephone whethe rit works and cannot change anything.
But it must work by going two ways which means reversing the equation and converting four diemnsions into 2 lots of ten and 2 lots of three.
Which is a total of 26 dimensions.
and this the number of Alex hardigan if he ever builds his quantum telephone.
I would prefer to believe it is a delusion of granduer and that timetravel even quantum is impossible.
But the fact that a telephone is a quantum device as well as a classical one takes it out the realm of science fiction.
But it would ruin everything.And it might ruin all kinds of things.
Or maybe the nature of things is that it could change nothing.That nothing could be corrected.And that everything would already have happened.
ANd thats hard to understand because when the future and the past are joined by a telphone.The future is fixed like in revelations it is written and cannot be changed.
because you cna write it down at the other end of the telphone.
So I hope Iamnot runing everything by talking about my experiences with telephone calls from the future.I know that I cannot remember anything about the future.
And maybe that is just the right thing that I don't remember what I was told.
Because if I did remember I would try to change history.
And it cannot be changed.
And that is for the best...................
Dailtone wrote a script about the quantum telephone and it was a great script.
People needed to know when they would die.
So perhaps the call from the future was made after my death.
That would make sense because then notghing could be changed.
It is ineviatble that they will call people after they are dead.
Because peoplewho are bad wants to talk with the dead.
And the bible forbids this kind of communicatioon.
And quantum telephones are ruled out because of Einsteins theory of relativity.
And they might require absolute time as with newtons equations.
And that is the best science science that rules it out.
I would rule it out too as a mental abberation or a hoax.
And either is possible.

A girlcan be so right that she is wrong...............She is 100% right for you so she is 100% wrong as well.
That is what my theory of four states in one and four forces being one as a consequence.
It is so right to believe the equation for the universe must balance.
That is wrong.
And the way on which it is wrong is exnihilo.
Everthing must come form nothing which is an unbalanced thermodynamic equation.
But if energy comes fromanother dimension that it can balance with matter.
As E=MC^2 so energy is equal to matter..
And the delaer deals the cards and the delaer has dealt the cards that Iam playing with.
And maybe it is a bad hand.
But I will make the most of it that is all anyone can do.
I have been dealt a bad hand that is what faraday could have said that I don't have any skill at math.
But he didn't say he could not do science.
Just because he could not do experiments.And I can only do thought experiments.
But they are good and they are enough to make a thoery work.
And that is just it this is a bad hand.
And you have been dealt a better hand so share someof your cards with me.
That is what people never think of doing because they are competitive.
and don't let me start on Hamburger University it is a university where they study all kinds of Physics without the MATH.
It is Faradays Hamburger University where kids that are B level students can study and get a degree in physics.
An associate diploma. And they can go from B-A and study a graduate diploma where some of the math is attempted at a B level.
And you can't teach math to a dog and that is the joke that they made on the elegant universe.
And can make an attempt to teach physics maths at a B level.
ANd anything is possible.
There could be another faraday.
And lets hope so but it will be not as we have hoped........
And it always is more than we expect.
And often it is less than we expect.
But Faradays university of B level physics is for average students to take physics as far as it possible for them to go.And take it no further than their abilities allow.
It is a dream that is a nightmare.
For practicing physics professors.
Because they want you to learn everything BEFORE You study physics.
And that is totally right so right that it is totally wrong.
YOu don't have to learn everything before you make up your first theory.
You shoud make up your first theory in physics on day one.
And always remember that it was wrong.
BecauseMonday, May 12, 2008
MAN WITH EINSTEINS MISSION 2
The interesting thing is I have no idea what Iam doing.
And of course I think Iam doing something good.
And Iam right Iam really doing a good thing.
And If I was wrong I would only be adding to the trouble people have.
And there is plenty of toruble.
But I can't add one little thing to peoples troubles.
And I can only do them good.
And that is what I should believe.
If Iam to write more because I should be convinced that I first do no harm.
And Iam not certain about that.
And everyone who is not certain has to have faith that what they mean for good won't be turned to evil.
And it my faith that has changed everything.
Because I did not know why I was doing a thing.
And now I think I dod understand.
Although I may be wrong.
But regardless of that I think I know the truth.
About why Einstein is wrong.
And of course there is no truth about why Einstein is wrong.
And there really is a good explaination of why his maths doesn't work.
For all the other theories that have to make sense as well.
They all have to be non contradiction.
And only Einsteins thoery has to be contradiction since it makes one of everything.
And you can't make one of everything without having contradictions.
But they are small.
And in fact they are very large.
And very many.
And they don't make sense.
Unless we complelety change the foundation of mathematics.
And that is what we have done.
And we have left the foundation as Aristotle and tried to prove Einsteins theory with Aristotle and of course this doesn't work.
Einstein and Aristotle are two different things.
That means Einstein and ordinary mathematics are two different things.
And there are problems ordinary maths breaks down at the big bang Einsteins thoery doesn't apply.
But we can add the the third equation and then everything is one.
BUt does that truely explain why Einstein is right.
Posted by STEVE at 2:08 AM 1 comments
RICHARD THOMAS- A MAN WITH EINSTEINS MISSION.
Garrett Lise had his theory then he wrote his book.That inspires me to write my book about a completed theory.
Because when I wrote before I didn't know what I was doing.
I didn't have any idea where it would end up.
Now I don't even know what I intended in the first place.
Because I have a much better theory that energy is greater than.
As a matter of fact it is the same theory only mass is greater than.
Because for energy to balance with mass mass has to be greater than energy simply because all of the mass will not ever be converted to energy.
Some must be lost in conversion.
So mass keeps getting more massive.
And that is just it I have completed my theory so now I don't want to talk about it.
But that is silly.
It is obvious that with each generation of universes mass must become more massive.
Because energy is lost each time.
And that doesn't make sense even to me.
But assume it is right it can be a guess that is better than some peoples calculations.
Energy is required for outer space that is from another dimension.
And maybe that is inner space and it is exactly that.
But energy is not required if it is evolution.
And to balance 2+2=4 the universes must become more massive as you approach the begining of time.
And if that isn't right and I haven't doubted until now.
The mass and the energy of the big crunch and the big bang must be identical.
And identical means the unviverse doesn't become more massive but energy is not lost.
And it is so eventually we would reach infinite energy.
And the alterntive is that we would reach infinite mass.
And that makes perfect sense mathematically.
Indeed it is a mathematical model of the unvierse.
And the fact that it begins with A Godel universe means everything.
That it is positivist.
It just happens that a Godel unviverse fits my facts it begins with a non contradiction.
That is maths that is 2+2=4.
And it ends in a big crunch that it is a contradiction.
That is maths taht is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
That is 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 FERMI/DIRAC= 1 BOSE EINSTEIN CONDENSATE.
And if this equation is true that the unviverse may have begin with a bose Einstein condenstate.
And it may have applications for physics.
because we may be able to make a fermi dirac condensate.
And it si juts the opposite we add two parts fermi dirac to one part Bose Einstein.
And a unviverse that is Godel cannot begin with a non contradiction.
And everything is saying that a contradictory universe can begin with a non contradiction.
So the universe prior to the big crunch would be a non contradictory universe like our own.
It is a circle where there are opposites.
And every circle is two opposites.
So thats the explaination.
And you haven't understood.
And I don't think another ten pages would help even a little bit.
Because the unviverse cannot be evolutionary because it becomes too massive.
It must be creationary science it must have started with a big Zap.
A big zap of energy from another dimension makes the two universes balance.
2+2=4.
Otherwise we would have to say that 2+2 doesn't equal four exactly that a little bit of energy is lost.
And a little may prove to be a lot.
So it might be a big difference to mathematics.
But we can assume 2+2 does equal four and the unvierses become more massive as time approaches zero.
And it must approach zero if it reaches infinity.
And then can be rounded off to zero.
I don't have any thng more to say for today.
And I do say it will be nice proving the theory right.
Because I have always begun the other way.
And now I know what Iam trying to prove.
But If my theory proves to be wrong then all my work is not worthless.
And that is like newton it is still a good thoery.
It fits the mathematics maybe better than any thoery every has.
It is Einsteins mission to prove everything is one.
And Iam Richard Thomas and Iam a man with Einsteins mission.
Only I can't prove it it be one.
I have to prove it to be 2+2=4.
If we have just one unviverse that the same applies to balance the equation we have to get energy from another dimension.
And it is easy to prove creation but it not easy with one universe to prove evolution.
Posted by STEVE at 12:33 AM 0 comments
Saturday, April 26, 2008
BLOG THE BOOK 12.
So we have finally decided to give the starwriter away.
And of course there are two starwriters so we shall service one and keep it and give the other away.
And it is a great gift for christmas.
But christmas can come early.
And everyone will rejoice.
Because they will say when Stephen gave Josh the starwriter it was like christmas.
Gods will was done on earth as it is in heaven.
I have no more to say because I can't talk about equations.
And of course I have plenty to say.
But not to those who love equations.
But even to them.
You can lvoe a thing to death and I have loved it to death.
It has reached it's final conclusion.
As one man said the things of God are clearly understood by the creation so they have no excuse.
And they have an answer of sorts to prove why God is wrong.
But they cannot resist the wisdom by which Stephen Speaks.
And that is why they want to crucify him.
And they have choosen the worst weapon of all his reputation.
But he is not alone all the believers have the reputation dragged through the mud.
And noone is immune to persecution.
But you can do something about it.
And that is not seek glory and fame.
And glory and fame is for those who do not believe.
For they will have their fill of what it means to be full of pride.
And maybe they will bow to Jesus and Ask him to be their king. further study willprove it right and it may that is what theories are all about.BLOG THE BOOK 1 AND 2
Todays diary,
I called ben Joans computer repair man and made an appointment
for the seventh of Feburary.
He won't be there that week so his technican will handle the job.
I also might get a manual on my Pioneer.
I can get it serviced but it is going to cost me $59 upfront.
Pussy has been eating mince that is good because we don't ever
know what to feed her,but she has been meowing too much.
Mum thinks she might be in pain.
But I don't think so she is OK.
Steve Patrick refunded the $100 I sent him by mistake.
Both guys are named Steve.
So it is going to take a few days for my paypal refund to clear.
Then I can pay Steve Cooper and he should get started on Sensible
girl on Thursday.
That is if he got his money I don't think he willl start until he
gets his hundred dollars.
Josh is still working on Branagan and Flanaggan.And I have told
him I will pay him in two weeks.
I had better be careful as I have to pay for the computer also in
two weeks.
But Joan sais her repair guy is reasonable.
But the question is what does Joan consider reasonable.$
Will it be cheaper than Drews $50.
Drew is a great guy but it looks like he will be replaced by
another guy.
The noone reads my blog I might as well write a book syndrome.
That is the name of this dairy.
I intend to reminse and talk about the past and the future.
How can I talk about the future.
The future of my song Back to the Future with the Chevy Ford
band.
I have asked them to play the songs warming up their instruments.
So people will always hear them first before they go on.
Rawhide is great for warming up instruments.
This machine is really hunky dory.It works 100% and only cost
$20.
The kids will like it much better than a typewriter.
My friend Ralphs kids I mean I might make a gift of it to Hanna
if she is a budding writer.
You just never know if someone is going to be a writer and you
always do.
The nonone ever reads my blog I will write a book syndrome.
That is what Iam talking about.
That is why Iam using a wordprocessor rather than a computer.
There is no accounting for taste.
And maybe there is an accounting for taste.
We has better watch out.!
I won $20 last night and actually I won $35 but I lost $15 back.
If I have sandwhiches for lunch I will be able to pay my RSL
fees.
So I can go to the club in the future.
I will have enough for busfare and my RSL fees.
Fixing the pioneer is a big expense I have to put $59 down.
And that is taken off the repair bill.
And I have to pay a courier to deliver the parcel.
I think I will because the girl said it was up to me.
And it is mum would not do it let alone dad.
But I can pay whatever it costs to get the Pioneer working again.
My theory of the big bang.
Four states of matter in one state and four forces one.
That means state and forces are one thing.
2 STATE+ 2 FORCE= 4 STATE/FORCE.
Now that is an equation really a theory for everything.
We should be able to prove that supercritical non newtonian fluid
has only two states.
And as a result only two forces there we have our equation for
the begining of the universe 2+2=4.
Maybe 2+2=4 is not such a bad equation for the begining.
But what if the maths was always non contradictory.
If it is never 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
Like my book sais.Only Einstein sais the math can be works out as
a non contradiction.
Is Einstein wrong and Stephen Jeffreys right.
That depends on what Stephen Jeffreys really believes.
Does he believe that the maths is a non contradiction and that
creaation began ex-nihilo.
Not out of a phase change from one state of matter to four.
That would produce the energy OK but what about the ID.The
intelligent design.
It is taken for granted.
But without it would there be order in a disorderly universe.
Can we build a bomb based on supercritical non newtonian fluid.?
Since nobel was an exposives manufacturer perhaps he would give
me his prize if I could make an explosive producing a plasma from
supercritical non newtonian fluid.
Then all four forces and four states would be one.
But am I right is finding correspondance between state and force.
No one is sure they ask thier local scientist.
Blacksmith friend.
Blacksmith friend Iam not sure you will ever solve time with my
Godel time machine.
But Godel has a universe which is opposite to our own in which
their are closed time loops.
Maybe it is opposite in being a non contradiction at the
begining.
If that is true then the maths works out in A godel universe for
the big bang.
A unified field theory is a possibility and the opposite is a
black hole in a Godel universe.
The reverse of this maths should give us the big bang in our
universe.
This is enough to keep mathematicians busy for centuries.
Or at least for five minitues.
It should keep them quiet for the scientist babysitters who are
minding the mathematicians making sure they are empirical.
But the baby sitters haven't done a very good job.
My thoery of everything is a universal program.
One that is a superomega 2+2=4 is a superomega when it is used to
get one equation for everything in a theory of maths.
But physics and maths are very similar if you can get one
equation for phsyics you can also get one for maths.
But omega means you can't or does superomega mean you can.
It gets confusing.
Wolframs celular automaton means you don't use maths to get the
rules for everything.
So in a sense it means Omega is right.
You have to go beyond maths to make it an experimental science.
Really these two things are the same.
Dad is really mentally unbalanced he listens to the radio and Tv
all day long.
And whenever I try to talk he tells me to shut up and listen to
the radio.
It has just gotten worse and worse over the years.
It shows what happens when you let habits get to you...
A habit is a force for evil.
Good habits are a force for good.
Like learning to fix watches.It is just too expensive.
And that is the whole trouble there are so many things to buy.
It would be good if everything were all on one kit.
Easy to use.
But it isn't easy and it might not be too hard.
Time will tell the future is what we make it.
If I could fix watches I could have a big house with a Big plasma
TV and a wife to go with it.
You can't have a wife unless you can support her.
That is what Will Robinson said about Sleeping beauty.
I paid Steve Cooper $100 today for Simply Sensible.
He said he would talk to Juli about doing the song.
They don't have any answers because they are not asking any
questions.
Like what would an ex-nihilo theory look like.
How would it differ from the big bang theory.
What if we add billions of years to exnihilo what do we get.
Rubbish that is what everyone might say.
But I don't think so.
Ex-nihilo is a non contradictory begining for the universe the
four states of matter are always four and the forces never become
one.
So the contradiction equation 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE=
1 APPLE/ORANGE is not true.
This arguement against the big bang is so strong mathematically.
That the only recource of the blaphemer is ad hominum arguements
against me.
They find scientific arguements ineffective.
This is because Einstein wanted a non contradictory theory of
everything.
And what we have is a contradictory theory of everything where
opposite particles X and Y are in the same space and the same
time in the same state.
The non contradictory thoery of everything would be creation in
the Godel universe where the maths that is the reverse of our
system could make sense.
This is just a begining for a creation ex-nihilo theory of
everything.
Everything including the expansion of the universe needs to be
taken into account.
Iam getting my computer fixed next pay as well as paying part
payment on two songs.
So money is going to be tight.
I wonder when I will ever have any money to just have a good
time.
Steve Cooper has booked Juli for next Friday.
He has recorded parts of the song Simply Sensible.
Steve Coopers son is in Jumped and Alien Versus Predator 2.
And I asked Steve Cooper if the girl from Dr Phil.
Could record in his Houston Studios and have pizza with the band.
Chevy Ford band.
The future is not ours to see.
But I figure if I have mercy on someone else that is trying to
make it it will water me as well.
One favour deserves another.
And it is by doing people favours who one day will be successful.
That one succeeds yourself.
Look at Kevin Rudd I tried to help him get elected.
He is now helping the homeless my main thing.
But he still refuses to put intelligent design in Australian
schools.
Maybe the unions won't let him.
It really matters to me as much as homelessness.
But how much does it matter to Kevin Rudd that creation is taught
in schools.
One would think it would matter a little to any christian.
Except an evolutionist and then he would want reasons to believe
curriculum taught in schools.
Either way it is the thought that counts remembering God when it
comes to what we teach our kids.
Next pay my major challenge is to give Stephanie Nickel a deposit
of $200 or more for the last stage of our script IN THE SHADOW OF
9/11.
It is a good script so far and Iam hoping Steph can finish it
without ruining the first 60 pages.
It has gone the way that I wanted it to go and it is important to
be true to yourself.
I would like a pair of crocs shoes.
And maybe they will have to wait if I want to pay Stephanie.
Unless I pay half the bill for Broadband this pay and the other
half next pay.
Supercritical non newtonian fluid does that mean 2 STATES+ 2
FORCES= 4 STATE/FORCE.
I think it really does although Iam not certain going from that
to plasma unifes the four states and four forces.
It is the subject of experiment.
And experiment can answer all questions.
Eddington said don't worry if the observations don't mathc your
theory the observations are probably wrong.
This is the opposite to the empirical approach to science.
Maybe you need a philosophy that can be tested by observations.
Maybe if science is not grounded in philosophy it can't work.
Was that what Eddington was trying to say.
For example there were not observations of an expanding universe
in Einsteins time so he modified his theory with the cosmological
constant which he later called his greatest blunder.
The future is ours to see.
And of course it was not Einsteins to see the future.And anyone
who makes up a thoery doesn't know whether it will be right.
But they should believe in it.
And to believe in it it has to add up.
It has to be as sensible as 2+2=4.
Then you can be certain that it is right.
And if it is really really simple then it cannot be wrong.
Yet even simple things can be wrong.
Simple observations of the way things work can be in error.And
observations are never wrong.
So If I base a theory on an observation that entropy reverses
when ice freezes.
then I cannot be wrong when I say entropy reverses for the big
bang.
But it doesn't.
And it has to to explain the order in the universe.My ramblings
juts off the top of my head.
Are as good as mud.
And they might be as clear as mud.
But totally interesting anyway.
And there is nothing unclear about my ramblings.
There is no future for rambling.
And there is a great future for blogs of all kinds.And maybe the
blog will never replace the book.
And it is Blog the book.
That is what this book is one big blog.
And it is exciting to have my starwriter on my desk.
Because writing is a slow process.
And if I leave it in the lounge room I will have a book in no
time.
One that isn't very good.And one that is just fine.
So what kind of a book will it be now.
A book about everything.
About totally anything I find interesting.
And the starwriter makes a great gift for me.
Because I can see what Iam writing.
And it is better than a computer.
It is great for writing my blog.
And what do I want to winge about.
If you are writing a blog you must want to winge about something.
And I do I want to winge about why it is so.
Because there is nothing worse than winging.
And asking why the problem exists in the first place.
is the first step towartds solving it.
So why do indentical particles X and Y exist in the SAME PLACE at
the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME.
I would say that they don't.
If I didn't believe the big bang.
And the big bang means 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1
APPLE/ORANGE is TRUE.
And if it is true identical particles can occupy the SAME SPACE.
Why is it so.?
And that is our problem why does this equation mean something
which cannot be true.
The answer is it does mean two opposites can be one.
But it also means identical particles can be made one.
And maybe both are true.
But to add identical particles you have to split them in 1/3s.
And maybe you only have to take a third of a particle
matematically.
And this is really interesting.A third of a particle
mathematically is a third of a particle.
It will behave just as if you had split the particle three ways.
So there is nothing to stop us putting three identical particles
togther on paper.


And that is a solution to fusion.
If we could do it in reality and not just on paper.
Then we could take three hydrogens and get one hydrogen.
Hydrogen three.
And that isn't it it is a new particle of hydrogen based on three
divided particles.
And maybe it is the answer.
But will never know if we don't ask the question why is it so.?
Why would three particles becoming one.
Generate power.
It is a answer to a prayer.
Because it might be an answer to a hope.
That one can be three.
Because splitting one into three is what three thirds are all
about.
But three into one is exactly the same process.
And it really is not.
It is putting humpty back togther again.
And if a third of a particle can exist at all.
Then it can be joined to another two thirds of a particle.
So we take the particle apart and then we put it back togther
again.
And that is humpty dumpty.
And it is a sound theory.
But putting particles togther in the same place at the same time
when they are identical.
Is plausible.
If we are dealing with forces on a par with the big bang.
Then paricles may disintegrate and reunite all the time.
What is my purpose noting les than nuclear oblivian.And of course
I ahve higher hopes than that for a world on the brink of war.
And it is insane to have high hopes.Ad it might not be insane to
believe that eventually war will be over.
And that nuclear power will replace ordinary power.
And that is exactly what happened.
So it could happen again.
After using the power that is given in anger.
It may never be used again not in anger but in peace.
And everything has it downside.It is the slipppery slope.
And sometimes allowing something does not mean the slippery
slope.
Sometimes things get better and not worse.
And that is the opposite to Murphys law.
And we cannot live our lives by Murphys law or we would always be
afraid.
That is what the law on non contradiction causes in me.
Fear of what it means to have exceptions.
But there have always been exceptions.
and there always will be one exception that is the big bang.
It can never be worked out as Einstein said that it could be with
on contraiction mathematics.
It takes a new kind of math QUANTUM STRANGENESS.
To work out the big bang.
If time can travel backwards and entropy be reversed then the big
bang can make sense.
If four states of matter being one means four forces are also
one.
The energy can be released on a grand scale.
Four particles A B X Y can be four states of identical particles.
and they can be one STATE and the four particles can be in the
SAME POSITION at the SAME TIME.
And this is the key to unlimited energy.
And you don't have to believe me ADOPT A PHYSIST.
That is what Iam doing.
And he will tell me to go back to the drawing board.
But in trying to prove me wrong he will prove me right.
And I will have plenty to talk about.
Because adopting a physics professor for collaboration was the
best move ever.
There is no answer to how much I have to want to be free.
Because if I believe writing is a curse.
Then I have to want to be free.
And everyone believes writing is no curse.
But what about a blessing I have yet to see any blessing from my
writing.
And it is obvious that it is no blessing.
Because it is plain that the fruit is bad.
And yet I continue to make a blog.
Because I hope in vain for something to happen.
That is positive.
And everything seems to be negative.
And all things come to those who wait.
One day I will be happy that I kept writing.
Because I could be afraid of all the possibilities.
Like a poisoned pie.
You can't believe God would make a poisoned pie.
And I do not believe that.
And the truth is I do believe God is the author of a poisoned
pie.
Because everything I believe affects me.And believing God is the
author of a pie that is poisoned.
Really makes it hard for God to reach me.
And it isn't the case.That it is hard for God to reach me.
And it really is true that He is trying hard.
To get me to believe the pie is not poison.
Because if anyone can eat the pie and not be hurt.
Then it is not poison.
But of course I explain the way of 666.
And I explain how to believe otherwise.
And of course I make it very difficult to believe otherwise.
But that is because it is difficult to prove 666 wrong.
With mathematics.
Because it is easy to prove it wrong with logic.
And that is what I will do right now.
I will prove 666 wrong with logic.
It is logical to do the opposite of what Jesus sais.
If Jesus sais 12+12=24 is right then 21+21=42 must be right.
And that is the logic of the blaphemers.
They simply have to choose 42 as there answer rather than six
fours.
If Jesus had said 42 was the answer they would choose 24.
And it is obvious that Jesus did not say anything.And of course
it is all in my mind.And I may have darkenes instead of light.
That is the whole question have I blasphemed the Holy Spirit by
talking about why Einstein is wrong.
And I might have done that if Einstein was God.
And of course he is not.
So I can prove him wrong without proving God wrong.
And maybe I can't prove Einstein wrong without proving God wrong.
Then If Iam really proving God wrong in my book Einstein Proved
Wrong.
Then it is a poisoned pie.
But if the purpose is to prove God right.
Then the pie is not poisoned.
And I don't know if my purpose is to prove God right or the law
of non contradiction wrong.
And that is just it if it is my purpose to prove non
contradiction wrong.
Then Iam proving all truth wrong.
And If I argue the big bang contradicts the law of non
contradiction.
Then I doing God a big favour.
And I might think so.But God doesn't need any favours.
And He would love one.
He would love it if I decided that ex-nihilo creation means
matter was never in the same state at the same time in the same
place.
That opposite particles cannot be in the same state and place at
the same time.
And this would really rot your socks if you were with reasons to
believe.
Because the big bang is mathematically impossible.
Unless we allow the creation equation.
And it is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
And it is a contradiction according to my enemies.
But if they are right it proves the big bang wrong.
Because that is a good purpose for a creation equation.
But if the big bang is right.
Then a whole new branch of contradictory math must be created to
allow identical particles to exist in the same state at the same
time in teh same place.
And that would not prove the big bang right.
It would mean it is not part of the set of truth.
IT would mean it is a lie.
And that is close to the truth.
Because the thoery that everything was once one.
Cannot be true if the law of non contradiction always holds.
The reason why the pie may be poison.
Is many good christians believe both the law of non contradiction
and the big bang.
And if one is not true then the other will still be true.
And sadly they will choose to believe non contradiction does not
always apply.
That makes my computer program poison.
Because it attempts to unify everything with my equation and
2+2=4.
And maybe 2+2=4 is the real saver.
Becasue the four forces can be four.
And they can if they are two forces plus two forces.
And that is what Iam explaining with non contradiction.
Because if forces are two they are not contradictory.
They are only contradictory when they are one.


Everything cannot be one they way God is one.
And if the equation attempts to make creation the same as the
creator.
Then it is a pot of poison.
But it is not clear in my book that the creation equation is a
means of proving creation cannot be a big bang.
If the big bang is 2+2=4 then it can still have occured.
Only in this way can the law of non contradiction be right.
But what if 2+2=4 is not adequate.
WHat if you can't explain the equations by adding them 2+2=4.
Because if the unviverse was once 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4
FORCE/STATE.
Then all equations should add up 2+2=4.
And Einsetins equatin doesn't.
Even though I have tried hard to prove why it can be 2+2=4.
Scientists would say it is fundamentally not a 2+2=4 equation.
And that is just it if I can come up with a theory of everything
that is 2+2=4.
The Hawking is a cosmic con artist.
And it does not follow from the conclusion.
And it really does follow.
Hawking believes you can prove anything with math.
And it will still be right.
But that is seperating the real world from the math.
And I can prove everything with the math.
I can prove Einsteins unified field theory.
At least in my delusions of grandeur I can prove it.
But I have never looked at the math of Godel.
Yet I claim his theory begins with a non contradictory big bang.
And leads to a contradictory black hole.
And this as good as what Hawking does.
And of course he checks the math first.
BUt I have come with the idea so Hawking can check the math.
If the the big bang is non contradictory in another universe.
That means it is contradictory in ours.
And maybe that is a recipie for disaster.
But time will not go backward in our universe.
And it will at the begining.
That is a new theory that Godel is right for the begining of our
unviverse.
And it sounds good and it was right off the top of my head.
Because it is good enough to loose my head.
Because the math can be understood to prove the big bang wrong.
Because the above should be true if the big bang is a
contradiction.
But if the opposite of a black hole in a Godel universe is non
contradiction maths.
Then that math should prove the big bang right.
But if it does not then it may prove exnihilo.
But exnihilo has never been combined with an old universe.
And if it were combined it would prove science right.
And religion right.

It would prove both wrong.And of course we don't know what it
woud prove.
But maybe we would be better off with a big bang.


Than ex-nihilo that argues evolution is right.
It is hard to argue evolution is wrong if the earth is old.
And that isn't true.
And it might not be the premise that everything exists without
cause.
Is a premise that is inadeqaute.
It is a God of inadequacy.
When evolution is put togther with ID.
Both are an adequate cause.
And they may be if ex-nihilo creation were combined with an old
earth.
But that would an an inadequate explaination of the origin of the
earth.
And only if everything had to be created all at once.
Maybe seven days means it took time for creation to take place.
And that is happened according to the laws of physics chemistry
and biology.
With a helping hand from ID.
Id is an excellent helping hand for evolution.
Without ID evolution cannot explain anything.
But with ID evolution can explain everything.
And that could be a suspect pie.
Because we are saying God lied about the creation of the
universe.
And of course we are not saying that we are saying Lord help us
to explain how you created everything.
Without saying you did it by chance.
And that is the pie of ill repute.
My universal program which gives rise to space and time.
Maybe it is terrific.
To be able to prove order within randomness.
or maybe it is just a way of arguing there is no God.
There has to be order within randomness so mankind will have a
choce whether to have faith or not.
Philosophy and creation science can never approach God.
And they cannot reach God without faith.
That is the four spiritual laws.
And If I were lost I would love them.
But because Iam found I don't regard them highly.
And it is the opposite if I were lost I would not regard the four
spiritual laws highly.
They are too simple an explaination for life the universe and
everything.
And Jesus explaination is 3*4.
Three laws about four spiritual laws.
And they are MAKE NO GRAVEN IMAGE.Because God can be random.
He can be an image that is random.
And God is never happy with graven images.
Graven images can be mathematical equations for God.
And that is exactly it making God one with everything is a graven
image.
And God is one with everything.
And only for the Buddhists.
Every single thing on earth is distinct and in kinds.
And there are kinds of all phenomonon.
And that includes things like states and forces.


They are never one but always kinds.
That means everything has never be one.
Everything has always been at least four states and four kinds of
forces.
That is the four laws for cosmology.
The fact that there are four laws for the universe.
Means there are four laws for everything.
And that might be 12 because there are three laws.
Of four.
And that is the total of all knowledge.
To understand what it means that three times four is equal to 12.
And maybe it just like 42.
Just an answer you give when you don't know.
But God does know.
So the answer he gives is not a contradiction.
And three fours is not contradictory any more than two sixs.
2+2=4 is equal to 12+12=24.
And that is the basis of the early univese.
It is simply not what they say it is.
And there equations are no better than 42.
Because that is actually the answer they are giving.
But am I trusting someone I love.
I believe so.
Someone I love would not poison me.
And If Iam poisoned by someone I love.
Then it my fault for trusting a little bit too much.
You can find the answers in my next book.
And I hope so that the starwriter will get many years of use.
Because it is an excellent tool for writing the truth.
And if I told lies I would say it is perfect.
But it is just a machine that makes it easy to write.
And you just would never get around to writing as much as you
will write on this machine.
The equation for acceleration is intitial speed- final
speed/time.
And it is 2.
Because then you can add Speed= Distance/time.
If you make that two as well.
And then you have an equation for the speed of deceleration.
And exactly what is the speed of the deceleration of light in the
mirror chamber.
If is faster than C.
And it may faster than any speed.
Because light declerates very fast.
The speed of decleration is not as fast as the speed of the
acceleration of light.
And it may be very fast but not quite as fast as that.
Light takes 0 time to acclerate.
And that cannot be true since it proves absolute time.
So it must take a little time to accelerate.
And we can measure extremely small times.
And maybe we can't measure how small the time is for light to
accelerate.
But we can measure the decleration of light.And estimate how fast
it accelerates.
But all of this doesn't make sense because I have added two
equations 2+2=4.
And acceleration and speed are two different things.
But if they are the same.
Then what is speed.?
It is something similar to accleration but not quite the same
thing.
What will happen if we add 1/3 ACCELERATION+ 1/3 SPEED+ 1/3
SPEED= 1 ACCELERATION SPEED.
And that will make everything right.
Making two things one.
And totally everything is wrong when speed and acceleration are
the same thing.
Because Einsetins theory not longer applies to speed and
acceleration togther.
We have a new theory that is what we will say.
Because we will say the speed of decleration is greater than C.
And then E=MCsquared not longer applies to gravity waves.Because
the speed of accleration of gravity waves is greater than the
speed of light.And maybe this makes no sense maybe it still means
gravity has to travel at C.
Then Einstien isn't wrong.
But maybe Einstein needs a better theory.
So he has one.
If Iam Einstein then I have a better theory the speed of
acceleration of light is always going to be greater than the
speed of light.
So acceleration is greater than speed.
And that is a terrific law.
Only accleration can never be expressed as speed.
And of course light travels a distance the size of the universe
when it reflected to infinity.
So time is expressed in light years.
And this is divided by the speed of light.
To get acceleration.
And a similar rule will give us decleration.
But when we add the equations 2+2=4.
We get speed of decleration.
And that means information travels at a speed when it transmitted
on declerating light.
And the speed is greater than C.
And if they would only listen they would have a new operating
system for windows.
Where information travelled at a maximum speed of infinity.
And speed means Boyles law is obsolete.
But the law of too much information means that will never build
the new operating system.
And that is a shame so information revolution means information
overload.
They simply can't keep advancing the speed of information.
Because of C.
Unless they can make speed and decleration of light one.
They can never beat Boyles law.
And you are reading it and you think you understand why Iam
wrong.So email me at aircloud@bigpond.net.au
And tell me why information can never travel faster than light.
It may be that you are right.
That information cannot be transmitted on declerating light
beams.
Or accelerating.
If that is so information must always be limited to C.
So boyles law must always apply.
If you have enjoyed adding newtons laws for speed and
acceleration.
Then you will love adding Einsteins equations for speed and
accleration.
Does Einstein approach an explaination of information sent at
faster than the speed of light.?
And his equations for speed and acceleration added 2+2=4.
Or in 1/3s.
Will give an answer to the problem of time.
Does information travel faster than light without going back in
time.?
At the quantum level it does go back in time.
But information is more than quantum.
It is classical and maybe in classical theory information cannot
go faster than light.
We will succeed where others have failed.
This is always the way to fail because others have failed to
prove Einstein wrong for a reason.
And the reason is information cannot travel faster than light.
But let us suspend disbelief for a moment what If information can
travel faster than light.
The the speed of the deceleration of information is faster than
light.
How do I prove Jeffreys wrong.
By measurement it is not an experiment unless you do your own
measurement.
You have to measure the speed of decleration in the mirror
chamber with 2+2=4.
And you find the answer is a bit like adding 2 FORCE+ 2 STATE= 4
FORCE/STATE.
Maybe the equations are interchangeable.
And of course they are goobledegook.
But the idea of 2+2=4 is the most basic of ideas it is not
goobledegook.
It means two ideas can be combined without contradiction.
But we could add 1/3 SPEED C+ 1/3 DECELEATION C+ 1/3 DECELERATION
C= 1 SPEED/DECLERATION.
No one can measure the decleration of light in the mirros
chamber.
And anyone can it takes a bright mind to do so and some very
powerful computers.
And it only takes a five year old with matlab....


So maybe the speed of decleration of light has not been measured
because scientists have not bothered to measure it.
I keep saying hey measure it.
But they say no they won't.
It is a bit like Bruce Almighty they have free will...
So if they ever choose to believe my book they might measure the
speed of the decleration of light.
And see if they can measure information travelling faster than
light.
In a round about way I have described why EInstein would be wrong
if he was wrong but have only proved him right.
The distance travelled by light when it is reflected ot infinity
approaches zero brilliance at infinity.
But never reaches it.
If light were to reach zero.
The explansion of the universe would be at the speed of light.
This proves Einsetin is right.
Because the expansion of the universe can never exceed the speed
of light.
However the universe can be accelerating faster than C.
And what affect would this have on the zero value for the
distance light travels.?
Superheated supercritical non newtonian fluid.
And it is another state.
And it really might be another state to be boiling.
But it is even more of a new state.
But it is not quite plasma.
If it were possible to change a supercritical non newtonian fluid
to plasma.
It would be four states in one.
And it would in theory.
But perhaps supercritical non newtonian fluid cannot exist as a
plasma.
But if we can imagine that it can.
Then we have four forces unified.
And that is the thoery that unifiying the four forces is simply a
matter of unifying the four states.
And if they are totally indendant then you have to unify the four
forces some other way.
And they don't have to be unified.And they do for Einstein to be
right.
That is why we should try to unify them by unifying the four
states.
Four forces can be two forces when matter is two states.
If this is true it simplifys the idea.
There is a direct relationship between forces and the states of
matter.
Even if there is no direct relationship four forces must be one
in the big bang.
And they must be two.
That is 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4 FORCE/STATES.
And it is probably true that making four one.
Is possible but not in the universe.
Creation exnihilo is the alternative of 2+2=4.
and that is possible that it really could be the big bang.
But if the big bang were not one force and were two.
It would be different.
And the ultimate particle for 2+2=4 is the photon not the gluon.
Since photons can be in the same state and place at the same
time.
So thye ultimate particle we are looking for is not solid light.
It is light in a state between states.
And if atoms are made up of solid photons.
Then that is solid light.
And maybe everything begins with photons.
And that is a wild guess.
But like one of spocks guesses it is better than some peoples
calculations.
And we can test it in the accelerator.
And we most certainly can try to find out if atoms are ultimately
made up of photons.
I like it because it is my thoery.
That is what a six year old would say.
I have to say I like it because it fits the data.
It fits the data from Genesis.
Maybe photons are the binding force of the atoms.
And that should be easy to test.
But sometimes like with strings the ultimate particle cannot be
detected with instruments.
But a photon rather than a string would be a totally different
theory.
Matter must be photon like in the big bang.
And that is totally true.
Matter must behave like photons in a stateless way.A maybe a
photon could vibrate at a frequency.
There I have unified string theory and photon theory for the
first time.
If we could imagine a string of light.
Maybe we would be cooking with plutonium.
And I just don't have the answers.
I could say that or I could speculate.
You might as well have two bob each way.
And that is what a lot of people do.
But I choose a rough horse and put the house on.
That is what Hawking sais to do.
And that is the way he plays science.
He bets on improbability.
But it is a good bet the universe is probably stanger than we
imagine it to be.
E=Mcsquared= 2 H+ 2 H + E= 4 H+E
And H is mass the mass of two hyrdgogen atoms.
And mass is equal to atomic weight for hydrogen.
And dont quote me.
Because it is true Iam certain.
E=mc squared= 2 M+ 2M+ E= 4 M+E.
And this is the test of Einsteins equation can you make
E=MCsquared equal to 2+2=4.
If both equations are equal then fission is equal to fusion.
That means the matter that is lost in fission is equal to energy
produced.
And the amount of matter gained in fusion is equal to the energy.
If they can be equal then Einsetin is right.
Matter can be equal to energy and not just mass.
The equations do not equal.
Is what you might say.
You might say E=MCsquared can never be expressed as 2+2=4 because
C cannot be 2.
And if fission can never equal fusion for energy produced and
more is produced by fusion.
The Einstein is wrong about equivalence.
There are two transformations of matter to energy and they are
both not equal to each other.
And that is just balderdash.
And maybe it really isn't because maybe energy and mass are not
equal to energy and mass.
And that is rubbish.
But the possibility that a new energy can be derived from four
states of matter being one.
And foru forces being one.
May mean the fusion and fission are two different things.
And of course they are a hydrogen bomb is not a putonium bomb.
And they are both plutonium bombs.
But it depends on how you phrase a question to the answer that
you get.
And I will bet they will prove Einstein right.
That 2+2=4 can be E=MCsquared.
And that fisson and fusion can be one.
That is it I really don't have anything else to talk about.
And I have decleration.
And I have explained that fully.
And decleration is newtons equation.
For acceleration reversed.
And it might not even be the same equation.
But if we add Newtons equation for decleration to Newtons
equation for speed.
We get the speed of decleration.
And it is equal to Pi squared multiplied 186,000 m/s squared.
And there is no reason that instantaenous doesn't take a little
time.
Pi squared multiplied by 186,000 squared is the fastest speed we
can imagine.
And it maybe the limit for deceleration.
Nothing can decelerate faster than light.
And light can.
Light can declerate faster than light.
So what is the point.
We can transmit information on declerating light.
And maybe we cannot use declerating light for information.
But if we can the speed of the information will be faster than C.
And we be travelling between two mirrors an infinite distance.
The distance is virtual.
And it is more than that it is a physical distance measured by
the loss of energy of light.
And maybe it is a simulator for the real world where light
travels a finite distance.
But you can't round off infinity.
And you really can make finity rational.
Because infinity is always rational.And it never is.
That is the whole point.
If an infinite distance is a rational distance time is absolute.
And if time is absolute anything can travel faster than light.
And only information can.
And of course I have talked about all this before.
So I must be finished.
And there always comes a point where the work is finished.
And maybe I want to finish with four forces thatare one and four
states that are one.
That is a good place to finish.
Because you have you choice of believing the big bang or
exnihilo.
And it on the basis of the test for truth.
And if the test for truth is wrong then the big bang is right.
But if the test for truth is not wrong that it happened
differenty to what they say.
We can say that it must be non contradictory to be a sound
theory.
And that is all we can say since ex-nihilo is not really a
theory.
If it were a theory we could compare it to the big bang and find
one right and the other wrong.
But maybe they are both right and the big bang mathematics must
be non contradictory.
Then 2+2=4 must be right for forces and states.
Because that is non contradictory.
But 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is
something the scientists do not agree about.
If it is the equation for the big bang.
Then it fails the truth test.
And if it is the equation for ex-nihilo then it doesn't fail the
truth test because something out of nothing is a contradiction.
In terms.
And that is what the contradiction is all about it is
acontradcition of terms.
Terms like space time and state and place.
Particles can exist in the same place even if they are identical.
And they cannot exist in the same time and state.
And I have said this before but it has become the total sum of
all knowledge.
And it might be just that I might know myself that I will choose
something else if God sais 2+2=4.
SO if the truth proves 2+2=4.
I would choose to believe the other equation.
But the truth sais the other equation is right and not 2+2=4.
And maybe that is a lie.
Because arguing against 2+2=4 isn't logical.
And that is the whole point of my books.
You can have a 2+2=4 theory of everything.
One that does add up.
But you cannot have a contradictory theory of everything.
And of course you can.
People disagree about whether the law of non contradiction is
true.
And they will always disagree.
But I should agree that the evidence is in favour of the law.
And I have not looked at the evidence.
And that is what I must do.
Before deciding the big bang is false.
I must be sure the law always holds in every circumstance.
That there are no exceptions.
And there ar eno laws like that.


Even gravity can have an exception.
SO the big bang is an exception to a law that holds true
otherwise.
That is if this equation is right 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3
ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
The non contradictory equation is 2 APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4
APPLE/ORANGE.
This could work for the big bang or ex-nihilo.
The maths is simple non contradiction maths.
So the theory has to agree with this law to be valid.
And no one will agree with that.
The hope that I have is that everyone will enjoy what I have
done.And that is because I have saved the starwriter one more
time.
So I can finish what I have started.
And make a dos file.
Because this starwriter can make a dos disc that can save dos
files.
And then I can open them.
And maybe I can open them with XP.
Then I can put them on a blog.
And everyone will say what a great blog.
And nobody ever sais that.
A blog is a blog that is my philosophy.
And it is not very good because there are blogs and there are
blogs.
And it is a great blog.
That is my conclusion and now I will make the dos file.

An experiment that reproduces the mechanism of the big bang is supercritical non newtonian fluids which make the four states one.
And perhaps the four forces into one superforce.
In a test tube mollasses with potassium perchlorate under heat and pressure releases an awful lot of energy.
You can reproduce the 1917 Boston Mollasses explosion and the superforce that threw cars into the air.