LAST 20 PAGES OF IN THE SHADOW OF 9/11.

Dear Steph,
In the last 20 pages Phillip makes a cameo as the Cable guy same actor sone up different.
And he installs a TV that shows a year into the future.This is only temporary so Thomas can't prove to other people that it is real in fact only Thomas can see the programs from the future
So Thomas knows what is ahead and tries to warn people.
With the help of the journalists from the christian talk show.
No one knows if the cable guy is an angel or Phillip come back for a brief appearance.
But you get a hint that he could be Phillips angel.
We can't seem to agree on how this story should go but you haven't given me any of your ideas for the ending.
If you did then maybe we could agree and go with one of those ideas.
Thought I would kill two birds with one stone and do my time travel movie as well.
Steve
Dear Steph,
Because Thomas only can see the cable guy and the programs from the future.
He is put on trial for his sanity.Especially since he refuses the new credit cards.
The defence argues ACTS 2:17 in the last days men shall see visions of the future.
They argue prophets have always seen visions and were never accepted by society.
The prosecution argues he has schizoprenia religous delusions seeing and hearing voices that nobody else sees.
They prove only Phillip sees the programs.
Phillips old Lawyer tells him to cop a plea.
So he pleads temporary insanity due to post traumatic stress syndrome.
This keeps him out of mental hospital as long as he stays on his meds.
And stays off TV.
But he arranges to go on the christian talk show to talk about the future one more time.......................
That should be all you need for 20 minutes of good stuff.
Part 2- Thomas the trial.
The trial becomes about the question whether there is a God or not.
But the judge rules it out of order.
Steve A jeffrey
Dear Steph,
Tell me how you like this idea.Thomas buys a new plasma and it plays up so he calls the cable guy to fix it from the yellow pages
The cable guy installs the TV he is juts a cable guy a bit strange but thats all.
He could still be called DOC BROWNOUT.
Phillip apears on the plasma TV when Thomas starts it up.
But he is floating on a cloud.
And he sais Thomas there are three and a half years of trouble ahead and Jesus has decided to show you a vision of what will happen in the next year.
These Tv shows are a year into the future...................
Remember FAITH IS ENOUGH ( The message of Left Behind).
And God still loves us and has a wonderful plan for our lives even when our lives don't seem so wonderful.
And only Thomas can see the program from the future everybody else sees the normal programming.
And only Thomas can see the cable guy.
So obviously Thomas needs a pychatrist you can give him one.
Thomas is a man with a message but know one will believe him about what the future holds.
Steve

RAWHIDE

Dear friends,
You want to know why rawhide is a christmas song.
It is because Jesus led a perfect life just like the sherrif he was the best of the best.
And the worst of the worst was Barabbas.
And if Christ had met Barabbas it would have been just like that.
If Chirst was the sherrif and Barabbas was the outlaw barabbas would have tried to make a deal.
But Christ would not make a deal with evil.
And he would if barabbas would change.
But that is just it Barabbas didn't change.
And Rawhide didn't change.
He was the worst of the worst when he died.
And he came up against the best of the best.
Because no man is totally evil beyong redemntion like Rawhide.
And some are totally beyong redemntion.
But Barabbas became a christian and he did become an outlaw.
Because the kind of man that is an outlaw wants to do right.
But never does.
He is amalek the smiling face of evil.
He comes to you in christian garments but he really means to kill you.
And rawhide might have said Brother let us put our guns away.
Peace peace when there is no peace.
And the sherrif said no way you will hang at the end of a rope.
And that is what sherrifs have always said.
And outlaws have always told a pack of lies.
Anything to save their skin.
And sherrifs always have believed them.
Because fear is a weapon more powerful than the sherrifs six gun.
Which means 10,000 angels cannot conquer fear.
But one shot into heaven is MY GOD MY GOD WHY HAST THOU FORSAKEN ME.
And he went there himself when he said IT IS FINISHED.
So you just like the song you don't get the symbolism.
But I like the symbolism and I get the song.
Because it is very cool.For christmas.

PI OPENS DOORS

Paul,
PI (on a calculator) *7=21.99114858/7=3.141592654*3.99999/4=3.1415848.
PI to seven places
1+4+1+5+8+4+8=30/7= average pi= 4.285714286
The difference between 22-21.99114858=8.85142* 10 ^ -03.
That is the difference between rational pi 22/7 and irrational Pi 21.99114858/7.?
OK Paul.
What are your objections now Iam using Pi proper the right value for the circle and not casual Pi.?
Put that into WASP instead of meaningless infinities in the theory of everything have rational values for infinity.
This works with a circle.!!!! The rational value I mean. Steve.

BIG BANG COMPUTER SIMULATOR

Firstly the big bang cannot be simulated on a computer.
And it can but only if you have all the information.
And the only information we have is comsic background radiation.
And we must make the most out of the information that we have.
Maximinsed data.
That is the objective.
Now a Tv picture can be reflected between a large vanity mirror and a small shaing mirror to infinity.
If the Tv image is small enough to begin with.
Then the image det dimmer and dimmer as it approaches infinity.
each image has it's own energy signature.And speed spectrum.Because the total decleration of light adds up to the speed of light taken to infinity.
And that is given by the equation PI SQUARED* 186,000 MILES SECOND SQUARED= X MILES SECOND.
And that is an infinite speed for light.
And it is quite possible that that speed is the data that we need.
Because it mazimises the speed of light and it is the speed of decleration.
The light travels a distance that is the equal to it's entropy.
Since light looses all of it's energy it travels the distance of the known universe.
All inside the mirror chamber.
And this can be simulated on a computer.
We can reflect cosmic background radiation as if between two radio mirrors.
And we can turn the clock back.
We can change the direction of entropy on the simulatot.
That means the universe will run backward in time to the begining.
And then we can reverse direction again to repeat the big bang.
And the data is the speed signature and the energy signature.
And also the red shift and in this case it is quite likely a blue shift.
All of this maximised our data on the big bang.
We can see what happened in the first few seconds after the big bang.
And maybe even before it.
And that is impossible.
But so far anything has been possible.
So I would not rule out seeing time before the big bang.
You can program this simulator in Adams supercomputer.
And it is real time software for absolute time for the whole universe.
And when can measure time absolutely we really are maximising our data.

DOCTORED RAT PI

3.14285711142857142857142857........'(recurring to 10,000 places).
Now doctored Rat Pi doesn't exist and it really does because we have added it up.
And it adds up to the same figure.
And that is what we have to do with 22/7 we need to add up ten thouusand digits.
And add up 10,000 digits of doctored rat Pi.
And we get exactly the same figure that is if we divide we will get one.
And we may get so close to one that is it infinity.
And that is very very likely.
So if they are the same then you can use doctored rat Pi instead of infinity.
And of course .99999999*4/3.99999*22/7/4*3.99999=
Pi is the same as .999999999.
And if it really is the same then the answer will be one.
And if the answer is any different to one then Pi is not exactly infinity.
Then it would do not good to replace meanigless infnities in the big bang theory of everything with doctored rat Pi.
But doctored rat Pi really is infinity.
But it also really is Pi.And that question will be debated forever.
Because if Pi is not infinity then does doctored rat Pi make it infinity.
Or are 14 places correct rather than repeated the digits to 10,000 places.
It really is just the same thing.
And you are saying hold on a miniute it doesn't repeat to infinity.
That means it works out.
And of course Pi can't work out.
And infnity can't work out.
But it can repeat and so infinity is rational.
You can add it 2+2=4.
And that is you have to do to make perfect sense out the big bang.
It was a non contradiction.
And not a contradiction.
And that is what rat pi would seem to imply.But maybe rational Pi only applies to the begining of the Godel universe.
And results in a bang bang producing a universe of contradiction.
Then irration infinities would be normal for that universe but not for the big bang.
And of course this is the answer to life the universe and everything and it is 27 that is three nines.
And of course we knew it all along that three lots of infinity would be the right answer.
Then it is not 42 and Jesus is wrong about the opposite that the answer is 24.
But the difference between 24 and 27 is three.
And the opposite to 27 is 72 9*8.
And that makes good sense if 9*3 is the right answer than nine times eight is the wrong answer for Pi.
And pi can be 72.
So you can test this.
But it wouldn't do any good.
Because some things are too hard to comprehened and numbers that are the exact oppposite are just one of those things.

SCIENCE TEN ACCOMPLISHMENTS STEVE A JEFFREY

1/ RADIO 3D BODY IMAGING DEVICE.
2/ BIG BANG MIRROR CHAMBER SIMULATOR
3/ CHEMICAL REACTION CATYLSER AND REVERSER.
4/ VIRTUAL TELESCOPE.
5/ NON CONTRADICTION ATOMIC BOMB.
6/ BIG BANG FUSION REACTOR.
7/ MECHANISM FOR THE BIG BANG.
8/ ROBOT PHYSICS TEACHER AND PHYSICS IDEAS GENERATOR
RPTPIG.
9/PROCESS THEORY OF TIME SPACE.
10/HOW TO WIN AT KENO WITH GAIL HOWARD KIETHS LAW.
11/ SOLUTION TO PI RAT PI REPLACES MEANIGLESS INFINITIES IN THEORY OF EVERYTHING. GETS RID OF 7 DIMENSIONS.
12/ QUANTUM TELEPHONE MODIFIED TO WORK ON OLD CALLS

HOW TO GROW HAIR ON A BALD HEAD.

reflecting radio waves to infnity.
Is just the same as reflecting a TV picture to infinity between a large mirror and a small shaving mirror.
The images looses energy every time it is reflected it also declerates.
And the total decleration is equal to the speed of light.
This is true and it has not been tested empirically.
But it is a simple matter of simulating it on a computer.
But to use it to graow hair on a bald head we need to develop a valve/transistor.
Something in between a valve and a transistor that will allow radio waves to be decelerated.
And then reaccelerated in a second valve to the speed of light.
Declerating waves will speed up the growth of hair.
And accelerating waves will slow hair loss.
And this all depends on reversing the arrow of time for hair.
And if it works on a bald head then we can apply it to treating cancer.
If it doesn't work I for one will not sell the treatment.
It sounds good so watch out of the machine doesn't do what it is supposed to do.
It is simple for A TV and radio repair man of last century to build.
And an engineer of the 21 st century may find it a little difficult.
because valves are ancient technology but they allow you to simulate a mirror relfecting radio waves to infinity.

SCRIPT FOR RADIO STATION INTERVIEW

1/ Four states of matter are one in the big bang.
1/3 SOLID+ 1/3 LIQUID+ 1/3 GAS= 1 STATE SOLID+LIQUID+ GAS.
Phas change contradiction equation epxlodes into a non contradiction universe.
The one state of matter is unstabe releasing energy when it gradually goes to four states.
2/ GODEL UNIVERSE- Begins with non contradiction maths after the big bang the universe is contradiction maths for example the universe rotates and time travels backward.
I suppose I have to give some credit to Godel.
You can revers on matlab to get a picture of our unvierse which is the oppposite it means you can work it out based on conventional maths.
It is all Set theory.
The big bang.You can program supercomputers with set theory and the contradiction equation .
1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+1/3 ORANGE=1 APPLE/ORANGE.
3/Computer Program available on CD rom.
ABCSIG. ARTIFICIAL BRAIN CREATION AS SCIENCE RANDOM IDEAS GENERATOR
Program adds equations 2+2=4 that armported with MATH TYPE 6 from wikkapedia.
Can reduce thousands of equations to one super equation E=MCsquared type equation.
The program is Delphie and will work with the apple supercomputer G7.
4/ Truth- have been considered the law of non contradiction.
So g bang may fail the test of truth.
Maybe ex-nihilo creation makes more sense if the laws of the universealways apply righback to the begining.
The laws of the universe break down to meaningless infinites as we approach the big bang.
SO we can substitute rational Pi whihc is Pi worked out to 14 places that repeat twice seven.
Rational Pi 3.142857111.
We can then makes sense out of the big bang at least in a godel universe where everything is rational.

5/ 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
2 APPLES+ 2 ORANGES= 4 APPLE/ORANGE
4/4=1 APPLE/ORANGE.
Divide by four and you get one equation for four fruit four forces or four states of matter.

6/ Francis Shaeffer argues the alw of non contradiction is the basis of all truth.
However since the maths of the big bnag was contradiction then was Aristotle wrong to apply this kind of math to creation.
7/ Was einstein wrong and string thoery wrong to try to make the thoery of everything non contradictory maths.
8/Open letter to Los Alamos on Blogger.
ABout building a non contradiction bomb that makes the four states of hydrogen one state and this is unstable leads to a kind of explosion that is like the big bang in kind if not intesity.
9/Maybe a better bomb that could destroy a country rather than a city may prevent nuclear war with Russia for the next 50 years.
If they had bomb that would destroy the universe wuold they test it.
It is like animal human hybirds they would test it.
10. Spaceships joned by an indestructable string of 2 LIGHT YEARS damter draw a circle a hypotheticcal hula hoop.
And quantum fluctations means the circle rotates at the speed of light.
Opposite direction in a Godel universe.

Will I get interviewed on Sit up Britiain with Bridget Jones after this.The Little red schoolbook: How to take a holiday(break) from college evolutionary teaching
Four spiritual laws of creation science

1/There are a million and one reasons to believe evolution.
2/There are a million reasons to believe creation.
3/You have to choose the million reasons to believe creation.
4/ You have to WANT TO BELIEVE CREATION.

Five laws of the scientific method…………

1/ Creation is a science not just a religion.
2/ Evolution is a religion not just a science.
3/ There is scientific evidence that supports creation as well as scientific evidence that supports evolution.
4/ Intelligent design is an empirical science not a religion.
(The bible is left at home.)
5/People ought to know what they believe and the reasons why and what they do not believe and the reasons why not.
10/ EVERYONE KNOWS THE CLAIM THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT CREATION IS FALSE.

THE HOLY SPIRIT AND THE BLUE TONGUE SKINK.
The Holy Spirit is like a blue tongue skink that lives in a spiders burrow.
The blue tongue skink eats the spider in it’s palace and sits on it’s throne to become king of the palace.The palace is the human soul.
And the Holy Spirit is the King of the Human Soul.
You need to get the wrong man out (spiderman) and the right man in (jesus).
A thief pleaded not guilty to stealing even though he admitted that the video showing him take the watch out of the handbag looked bad.
We are all like that theif we plead not guilty to breaking the ten commandments but the evidence is against us.
We need to plead guilty and then Christ the just judge will exhonerate us.

CREATE AN INTEREST IN THE GOSPEL CATAGORY......EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT................
Appedix to the ten laws some of the scientific evidence for and against evolution.
Four reasons to believe theistic evolution.
1/ Proper science proves the world began with a big bang 3.5 million years ago.
2/The speed of light bieng a constant and the distance of the stars prove there was time enough for evolution.
3/Chance is a process controlled by laws of chaos theory.
Chaos theory means there is order in randomness created by God.
4/Evolution is the mechanism God used to create.
Four reasons to believe creation science.
1/The lack of intermediate forms in the fossil record.Darwin said this proves him wrong.
2/The earth is too young for evolution.
One example is the rotation of the earth is being slowed by the moon it has not slowed enough for the earth to be old.
3.Monkeys have 99% of human genes but so does a banana so similarity doesn't prove anything.
4/Geology does not admit into evidence a worldwide flood.
Since the flood is an historical event recorded by all people groups uniformatarian geology must be wrong if it excludes it.
Four reasons to believe in ID.
1/Irriducible complexity example the flagella like a mousetrap it cannot work without all of it's parts.
2/A watch found in a field can be assumed to have a designer.
3/The Greek Philosophy of ID is opposite to the philosophy of the atomists which led to atomic theory.
Both theories are scientific and empirical and do not depend on interpreting the bible or other religious books.
Note:Tradition isn't all bad.
Because of our traditions every one knows who he is and what God expects him to be

THEORIES OF LIFE THE UNIVERSE AND EVERYTHING.

Firstly 12+12=24 is the opposite to 21+21=42.
And is it really opposite it most certainly is because it adds up to six sevens.
A four sixs is the opposite.
And it really means 2+2=4 is six.
And not seven as you would expect from Christ.
But 2+2=4 really is six lots of.666.
And 7 lots of .666=4.6662
And that is a kind of 42.
So it all makes sense jesus has an opposite thoery or Douglas Adams has created an opposite thoery to Jesus.
And Jesus was first before Einsetein he predicted E=MCsquared is 2+2=4 when it is six.
And 2+2=4 for 21 is 42+42=84.
And that is totally opposite to 2+2=4 when it is six.
And you have gatherered that Iam not going to explain why it is so.
But I will explain how it is.
How meqan it is impossoble to put a numerical value on E=MCsquared.
Because you need a value for time space.
And that is 1+1=2 when we use 12 hours in day instead of two lots of six.
And they really are the same thing.
That means in the begining time was 1+1=2=2+2=4.
That means 1C+1C=2C+2C=4C.
Because C is a measure of time and if Phillip Adams by two lots o f21 proves Einstein wrong.
That Jesus by two lots of 12 proves Einstein right.
And of course Iam a clueless girl.
But a girl can understand YING AND YANG were equal in the begining.
And YING AND YANG are opposite particles in the same same state and space at the same time.
And do I have any other theory.
But maybe it is 42 because that proves different things to YING AND YANG.
But if 42 is right than Jesus sais 24 makes more sense for time.
And time needs two opposite universes.......
A Godel one and ours.
This is my science blog if yhou don't like it go elsewhere because the forces of good own the Hakwing forum.
Why and it is a question of how because religion provides the answer to the Why questions.

TIME TRAVEL FILMS

3 TIME TRAVEL FILMS FOR 2008.
TIME TUNNEL PASSION OF CHRIST.
ID I DON"T REMEMBER LAST NIGHT.
THE CABLE GUY. 2#.

I want you to do a new script for me next year this time I will pay in advance.

The title is THE CABLE GUY.

It is about a guy who buys a second hand plasma TV at a Cut price.

And it works great at first then it begins to break and everything goes wrogn with it you can imagine.

So he calls the cable guy who fixs plasmas.

And his nickame is the "DOC" he does experiments on time travel in his spare time.

And his time machine works by drawning power through an ordinary outlet from a nearby nuclear plant with a tesla coil and a valve that makes the four states of matter one so that the four forces are one force electricity.

SO he is able to produce 1.21 GIGAWAT ( this all sounds pretty convicning to those trained inn science).

The cable guy fixes the TV but builds in his time device.

Everything works fine until the Tv begins to pick up broadcasts from next weeks news.And everything happens just like on TV

Then it begins to pick up the news a year in advance.

And he sees the antichrist on TV and everybody is required to have a number 666 to buy or sell.

So he tells his boss and he gets fired he tells his girlfriend and she leaves him.

And all his friends desert him when they hear his warning about the future.

So he calls the cable buy back and asks him if there is anything he can do.And he sais that the time machine is tuned into A godel universe that is like our own but everything obeys murphys law in this universe.And everything is predestined free will doesn't matter.

He sais nothing is predestined in our universe everything can be changed.And free will does matter.

So he fixes the Tv so it shows CAMPUS CRUSADE PARIS HILTONS FOUR LAWS ADDS rather than the future news.

As a result of watching this the guy realies God loves him and has a wonderful plan for his life.

It is just a matter of confession so he starts having a positive confession.

He confession is Joyce Myers "DO IT ANYWAY SCARED."

So he gets a new job his wife comes back to him and his friends hold a birthday party for him.

He blows out the candles and they all say FOR THE FUTURE.

And he makes a wish.

Wishes can come true can't they.?

What a great script idea Steph.

You have to promise that you will do it next year.

I always wanted a time travel film.......................If this first film works out maybe we can do another one.

But if it doesn't come off thats no reason to give up these kind of setbacks happen in life.

marty Mc Gnat calls Doc Brown out on the mobile to tell him everything is Ok now that they both believe God loves them and has a wonderful plan for their lives.
Doc installs the casino channel a year in advance and they see themselves getting married in the chapel of love by Elvis Presley after winning the million dollar jackpot.
And Doc sais that is not suprising as I was about to install fox sports bets a year in advance.

OPEN LETTER TO BRAD CARTER USQ ABOUT THE SUN.

Dear Brad,

I have a new theory of everything.

And it is the same one as I have been propounding.

And and course it a new modified theory.

It is based on the unprovable law the theory of non contradiction.

Opposite particles A and B cannot be in the SAME STATE and the SAME TIME.

And they Can briefly.

But they are UNSTABLE this INSTABILITY leads to the big band.

An explosion of non contradiction.At time zero contradiction and non contradiction perfectly balance.

And as the big bang proceeds the laws of physics become rational.

We can imagine as a thought experiment a universe where the big bang begins with a non contradiction and produces a universe where the laws of the universe are contradictory a Murphys law universe where everything can go wrong and does.

The total opposite to ours.

The rational value of PI .99999999*4/3.99999*22/7/4*3.99999= X.

Is used instead of meaningless infnities to make the big bang non contradictory and rational numbers.

The four states of matter solid liquid gas and plasma cannot be one state and one space at the same time.

But this equation would seem to indicate that it can happen.

1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.

If it is not A solid it is B liquid.If it is not A or B it is C gas if it is not A B or C it is D Plasma.

But the contradiction equation means converting 2+2=4 to 1/3 2+2=4/12.00012= 1/3+1/3+1/3=1

This is my way of converting four states of matter to one equation and the four forces will also convert to one equation when matter is in this state.

My theory of how the sun works.

The sun works by non contradiction with a little contradiction between states.

When the degree of contradiction becomes too great the sun becomes unbalanced and super nova or neutron star or black hole.

When the sun is more contradiction than non contradiction of states it will super nova or become a black hole if the mass is great enough.

This is a return to the original state of contradiction of the universe.

Entropy means things tend to return to their original state.

But a reactor might explode that is what I mean by adapt of die if we could build a sun on the earth if we did not get the balance of contradiction and non contradiction of states right.

The earth might be destroyed.

Then they would say the reactor is going critical adapt or die let us pray for salvation.

That would be scary in a way.

But we need to be able to provide unlimited energy for growth to continue..........

You can build a D.D.I.A.E supercomputer like Calvin College for $2,500 and test my theory.

Or you can buy an apple desktop supercomputer G7 for under $10,000.

I will give you the non-contradiction theory of everything computer program in Delphie for you to play with.

How do you like my little theory please keep me updated.

Don't treat me like amushroom keeping me in the dark and feeding me shit.

Stephen A Jeffrey

OPENN LETTER TO LOS ALAMOS AND BRYAN GREENE

The four states of matter are solid liquid gas and plasma.
I have also heard them described as matter negative matter dark matter dark energy,.
Can they all be in the SAME STATE AT THE SAME TIME AND THE SAME SPACE even briefly.
In violation of the law of non contradiction.
If they CAN then they are a bomb.
But if the four states of matter are one and we cna write an equation for that then we can write an equaton for the four forces unified too.
That is my theory PROVIDENCE I call it.
THIS IS THE LONG AWAITED SOLUTION TO UNIFIED FIELD THEORY.
When solid liguid gas and plasma are all int he SAME STATE AT THE SAME SPACE AND THE SAME TIME.
Then THE FOUR FORCES ARE ONE.ONE EQUIVALENCE EQUATION FOR EVERYTHING I CALL SIX OF ONE HALF A DOZEN OF THE OTHER.
IT WAS A LEAP OF MY INTUTITION
Try it on the four ordinary states of matter then try it with dark matter and dark energy equations.

OPEN LETTER TO BRYAN GREENE

Dear Bryan,

This is the question of laws unto themselves of being ashamed of the creator.

And coming up with a mechanism for the big bang.

A no God of the Gaps theory.

And of course it doesn't answer the question WHY.

But a better question than why is it so is why is not so.?try answering that one.

A thought experiment about why it is not so is a non contradictory rational mathematics begining for the universe.

We imagine as a thought experiment a universe where time zero is contradiction and the maths before time zero obey this rule.

1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.

My computer program adds thousands of physics equations cut and pasted from wikkapedia.

And come up with one equation for energy which is NOT E=MCsquared but a super E=MCsquared.

One for every type of energy.

And this universe which begins with my value for Pi being rational which makes the maths rational too.

Explodes because non contradiction is untstable in this other universe.

So at time zero contradiction is becoming non contradiction and that is reversing it for our universe.

In this other universe the though experiment the law of physics after zero become contradictory.

And of course you can put this model into a supercompuer and reverse it exactly to get a model for our universe.

And you won't do that because you are ashamed of who told you to do it.

A creationist.

And Iam a believer in ID.

But I believe God set it in motion.

That means once it had begun it was like dominos.

And I may not believe that I may believe God is involved in every atom and every individual made up of atoms.

And that is avery old theory PROVIDENCE.

And PROVIDENCE is what I have called the scientific theory that the universe is contradictory.

Because this universe is one in which the dali lama equation produces one equation for everything.

And if that is true that the big bang itself is non contradictory.

And the unviverse it has given birth to is quantum mechanics not non contradictory like Einsetins vision.

That means we can apply Einstein to the big bang if we assume a non contradctory ratioonal value of Pi for the big bang.

.99999999*4/3.99999*22/7/4*3.99999= X.

Pi works out to be a repeating value of 14 digits.

It's mean is 3.73333333333 56/15.................

And this either applies to this universe or our other hypothetical universe.

Either "PROVIDENCE" IS RIGHT OR THE BIG BANG.And this allows us to put exnihilo as a tentative scientific theory.

It may not actually be a non contradictory big bang if such a thing can really exist.

But perhaps ratoonal maths is the only kind of maths that makes sense so the opposite to out unvierse will make sense to science.

Which means SCIENCE CAN NEVER MAKE SENSE OUT OF OUR UNIVERSE WITHOUT RELIGION.

And you can't blame me for trying bryan.

You should not hate me.

Because I ahve a theory that can be put to the supercomputer test you can use the WMAP data and the data from particle accelerators and the string theory of gravity.

To see if non contradcition could have applied to the intial state of the big bang and been UNSTABLE.

This being A MECHANISM.

Please give me credit by quoting my book with reference to this theory of everything.

THE JESUS EQUATION JOHN 11 VERSE 9. THAT IS ALL THE CREDIT I WANT THE JESUS THEORY OF EVERYTHING. Because you won't believe this but I believe he has done it all on the cross that includes the begining and the ending.And that is the jesus theory of everything.His equation is 2*6+2*6+4*6 which is the exact opposite of DOuglas Adams

21+21=42 or 3*7+3*7=6*7.

Six is just not right for seven but is right for 2+2=4.

And you can make six and 2+2=4 into an equation for E=MCsquared.

So you know the truth the truth is what JOHN 11 VERSE SAIS it is.

And also Douglas ADAMS answer to life the universe and everything.

And this must be satisfying intellectually to your curiosity.

Because you would like to know what Jesus has to say about Physics.

Stephen A Jeffrey

OPEN LETTER TO LOS ALAMOS ABOUT A BETTER ATOMIC BOMB

Dear John,

This is my string theory equation and I got it from an old book.

"Identical particles X and Y cannot be in the same state and space at the same time."

And I got this from the old book.

So I looked up the theory of non contradiction on Wikkapedia.

And found this definition Opposite particles X and Y cannot be in the same state at the same time.

And of course I have added space to make it apply to the big bang.

And it applies perfectly in that it provides a mechanism for the theory of everythning.

An equation like 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is the Green Salad eqaution and we just replace apples and oranges with cumcumbers green bananas and green apples.

The contradcition equation is irrrational because it is infinity and not actually one but the square root of one.

So it is a way of understanding irrational numbers.

And the big bang is irrational because the laws of physics including EInstein do not apply to the intital state.

But if the initial state was one of contradiction.

Then that explains the INSTABILITY that LED TO THE EXPLOSION.

And you can put all of this into a Supercomputer and call it prject NAYEKA COMMANCH OR PROJECT" ROUNDABOUT."

And it is a good name for a project to build a better atomic bomb.

And contradcition explosion leads to a non contradcitory universe.

That is the theory based on the old equation from the book.

There are four states of matter.

And they can all be one in the intial explosion.

Making one equation from four is what my theory is all about.

making 2+2=4 = 1/3+1/3+1/3

4/12.00120012=.333333.

You can find the answer by programming contradiction maths into a supercomputer.

And simulating the big bang explosion to get non contradictory maths.

Please give me some feedback give me the email of one of you scientists at Los Alamos

I can talk to I would like to help you with the theory of non contradiction.

Steve

I SAW A UFO AND NOBODY BELIEVES ME.

I was hanging a clock in my toilet I slipped and my head hit the sink.
And when I came too I had a revelation.
Of rational Pi what makes time travel possible.
And the star wars theory of everything two spaceships joined by an indestructable string.
And this proves everything about Newton that he was Einstein.
Because 2 F C + 2 F C= 4 F C.
That is the force of the speed of light.
And you can calaculate it as the stress and strain on a n indestructable string of two spaceships travelling in opposite directions at the speed of light.
If C can't be added then rotational kinetic energy can be added in this example.
But what has this to do with rational PI.
Pi is infinite and the speed of light is infinite and when they are put togther you get a rational speed of Pi.
And the speed of Pi makes it possible to travel to alpha centuri in how many years.
This is a question I can answer.But it just a little beyong my calculator and I will give a try.
And I ahve failed because the speed is almost instantaneous.
It is vastly faster than the speed of light.
And it is possible that light can travel at a speed close to infinity.
And still be a rational speed that means it is possible and that is what the maths sais.
So if it is possible to travel at 2C then travel through time should be possible.
But just adding force of C doesn't make time travel possible.
It is a way around relative time.

STEVES BAD MUSIC BLOG.

My 14 songs are all in the past.And they are all in the future.
Because I made them up in the present.
But I remember them in the past.
And they will be successful in the future.
And they may never be successful in the past.
And they just maybe.
If someone sends them through time.
And if they did they did not have my permission.
And that silly how can you give permission for something thats impossible.
And if you gvie permission then it's not impossible.
That is how it is for God but not for us.
Unless we want to think we are gods.And then maybe our permission is enough.
My song Interstate 54 was my best one but everyone liked I NEED YOUR HELP BARRY MANILOW.
And there is no reason for that.
Interstate 54 is more original and is a better song.
But that doesn't mean Yukky was a bad song.It is was a good begining.
And I began with Oh Christine.
It was my very best song.
Because Libarace played it on the piano on TV.
And he said it was my song and he said one of his little fans made it up.
And I was that fan.
And I was surpised.By how great great can be.
Because I was suprised by how unhappy great can be.
And there was everything unhappy about Ray Stevens singing my song.
Unless I sang his.
And that was the sad part he sang mine.
And I sang his.
And we both were unhappy.
So the thing is to sing your own song but you will never know which one is your own.
And it is always interstate 54 the one they don't like as much.
Because you are not much of a songwriter.
And that is what I would have said until I wrote Hollywood Donna.
Because Iam Ritchie Valens and Iam palying a part Ritchie Valens sent back to earth to make a difference.
And it fits all the facts.
But that doesn't mean it is true.
But if it was that would explain how good Iam at writing songs.
So it is a good theory if you want to be a Buddhist.
And I did as a kid wanted to be a king fu dream.
And my favorite song is Didn't we.
I have my own version and it is great to have your own version of Didn't we because it is that kind of song that is funny.
And I like funny songs.
Like As time goes by.It is a fun song for lovers of coffee.
And of course that is Muggachino only the chorus has been writtten but it already a hit song.
That is the way it is with songs they take on a life of their own.
And they do it as they are being sung for the first time.
And they either great from square one or they are not great.
And you can tell if a song is going to be great.
So buy my album from LULU STOREFRONT STEVE JEFFREY STEVES ALL TIME FAVORITES.
And Physics is just the hobby songwriting is what it is all about.
And songwriting can never be more than a hobby.
But Physics is something that keep the mind occupied forever.
Because there are always new answers like they always new songs.
And once upon a time there were never new songs.
Now there are ten new songs too many to do at once.

OLD EXAMINATION RULE-LISTEN TO THE QUESTION

PHYSICS A LEVEL. EXAM. 2020.
QUESTION 2 PART A. can two particles X and Y exist n the same state and the same time in the same space.?
PART B. Is this contradictory to the laws of physics as we now know them.
PART C. Do the laws of physics apply to the big bang as rational values of Pi.?
or are all the laws of physics prior to the big bang irrational contradictory and beyond the power of maths to calculate.?
PART D. If rational maths cannot calculate the state prior to the big bang then is it a matter of using irrational numbers in a contradiction of an equation.
ie adding apples to oranges.

LARGE SPACE TELESCOPE-LST

The whole problem with a telescope in outer space is that there is no air.
So clearly you picture of everything is going to be less that 100%.
And that obviously not true.
So why am I arguing that a telescope on the ground can be just as good as one in outer space.
Because it is all in cyberspace and there is no air in cyberspace.
And you have to add up images that are reflected to infinity.
And this is easiest to do if yo have a TV picture it can be reflected to infinity.
And it's resolution does not increase.
And if that were the case that multiple images could not be put togther in such a way that resolution increases.
Then this project would not be worth anything.
But the total resolution of the iamges reflected to infinity.
Maybe the sum of all the parts.
And that is true unless we add another picture.
When we add a second picture reflected to infinity.
We are adding two infinite resolutions and magnifications.
So we get 2*.
And if that were the case then millions of sperate photos even if they were copied by the computer.
Woudl produce millions of times resolution and magnification.
And it does work that what Nasa said about the picture of Orion.
When you increase reoslution you can increase magnification.
And we will learn how to use computers to do this effectively.
So we able to magnify a digital image many thousands of millions of times.
So we will be able to see the planet 20 light years distance.
And we may be able to see one 1000 light years distance.
There are no limits to magnification.
Just as there are no limts to resolution.
If that is true that infinity is the limt.
Then we add until we reach infinity and we never will reach it.
And that is what Pi can do for us it can give us an infinite resolution.
Because Pi can be taken to infinity and be rational.
And this gives is a focus which is infinite in it's nature.
And maybe we won't learn how to use rational Pi in this way for awhile.
But computers are destined to take over from telescopes to view the universe.
And there are limits.
And the limit is the size of the telescope.
And an infinite number of pictures from the same telescope will work just as well as pictures from different telescopes.
But is difficult to see at present how an infinite number of pictures can be taken.
But if we succeed in taking infinity to a rational number.
Then we can have maginfication that is unlimited.

THE PERFECT WILL OF GOD-YOU CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH.

So what is the perfect will of God.If we knew we could not handle the truth.
And that is what everyone thinks.
Except one person that is the Son Of God.
Because He is happy to do exactly what god wants.
And he alone can fully satisfy God.
So if he wants you to do His will it will be satisfying to God.
But is his will just a matter of ten commandments.
Or can't it be expressed as a commandment.
And of course His commandment is that we love one another.
And of course that can't be done.
And it really can't today because people are backbiters and a number of other things.
Contrary to all reason.
And that is a good way to desribe non believers the contras.
Because they are totally without mercy.
And that is an understatement.
And mercy is one of the most important commandments.
And totally second on the list is to be kind.
And noone bothers to be kind anymore.
That is for the 60's.
And the 80's were not kind.
So what about 2010 will that be kind.
And obviously not.
If people don't keep the law.
Because it has become a matter of keeing the law.
And it never was meant to be that hard.
And it always was difficult.
And once upon a time the exception was scrooge.
Now it is the rule.
People are not willing to even buy a present.
Because they have an agenda
Something more important that simply being kind.
And maybe that adgenda is good.
But it can never replace kindness.
And what is God perfect will.
That you celebrate christmas better than the next man.
And that may be the best way to look at it.
There are four laws not ten.
And if there are only four you would think people would be happy.
You would think they would would celebrate.
And they have that right to celebrate the four laws.
But they choose to clingn on to the past.
And not be glad.
But be scared that they are not saved.
And that is what Way of the Master has done for many.
Replaced joy with fear.
And there is nothing wrong with law.Romans is all about law.
But Corinthians is all about love.
And that is what Love is all about remembering John was the most loved of the dicriples.
And he had one recipie and that was not fish it was that we should love God and love one another.
And it will never work.
And maybe not until jesus returns but one day people will love one another.
And Gods perfect will will be done on earth as it is in heaven.

THE LOST IN SPACE ROBOT WISDOM FROM

The function of any computer is to draw conclusions from provided data.
If conclusions are contradictory provided data is at fault.
There is nothing wrong with my data there is a good deal wrong with your conclusions.
Identical data will provide identical conclusions.

ASTROLOGY THE PROGRAM

Firstly astrology is juts as good at making predictions as the laws of science.
And astrology is a law of science.
The question of whether anything ever escapes a black hole can never be answered.
And it really can be answered.
Because for something to escape a black hole there has to be determinism.
And if there is determinism then something can escape.
2+2=4 is an equation.And it really is a special kind of paradox.
Becauuse if one particle is in a black hole we can predict the other particle that is outside the black hole.
And that really is not the case.
Although it makes sense to believe half determinism.
Because we work out what the spin and velocity of the particle inside the black hole.
By knowing what the spin is on the outside particle.
And it is clear that we can guess.And that is something which is not determined by randomness.
And of course it is.
We can get it right half the time.
Because it must be odd or even.
So if place a bet on 40 random numbers being odd and 40 random numbers being even.
We have to get 20 numbers right.
If we bet for as long as possible.
That is forever.Because if we have an infinite number of trials we will not get more than 20 right.
And that obviously right.
Because we don't need an infinite number of trials to get 99%.
But to get 99.999% we need infinity.
And of course we can use rational PI.
That is Pi taken to infinity.
And it doesn't prove that there is determinism.
And if we can determine the value of Pi to infinity we can determine any probability to an infinite number of trails.
And it may be only be the mean.
But it will be accurate.
So the clearness of 1+1=2 IS that odd+ even= odd.
And if we know the spin then we know odd and even.
And we can know 1+1=2 by knowing 2+2=4.
And that the key to determinism.
One determines the other.
If we use the same spin.
And if we use different spins then they are the opposite.
I will not try hard to prove determinism since astrology is a program that is definetly meant to prove determinsm.
And if it doesn't work.
Then no amount of effort will prove that it does.
But the equation for fission is 1+1=2.
And the equaton for fusion is 2+2=4.
So fusion is determined by fission and fission is determined by fusion.
So we just need to understand both properly.
Energy is converted to mass. And mass is converted to energy.
These are the same as two different spins.
And understanding that is understanding just about everything.

THE ICING ON A PINEAPPLE UPSIDE DOWN CAKE AND COCONUT CREAM PIE

What is the icing of the cake.
And there is none.
And of course there is there wonderful icing on the cake.
Because that is the only to describe the theory of non contradiction.
It is wonderful.
Because it describes a universe totally free of Gods.
And it really does not mean a mechanism that is independant.
Because it must be dependant up God or gods.
And that is not science.
But no matter how far back you go.
You cannot go back as far as God.
And that is what we have done we have gone back to the intital state of the universe.
One of chaos and contradiction.
So that only the contradiction equation can make sense out of the laws of physics which applied prior to the big bang.
The intital state was X and Y and they were opposites.
And they were in the same space and state at the same time.
And this is impossible in the present universe.
But it was not impossible in the early universe.
And if that were the case it would have been stable and would not have exploded.
But the law of non contradiction applied.And the creation of the contradiction was totally unstable it had to result in non contradiction.
That is my theory that a contradiction explosion results in a universe of non contradictioon.
And of course this is not circular reasoning.
This is a mathemtical model of the law of non contradiction.
And nothing is a better way to describe the intital state of the unvierse.
It was chaos and it became order.
But the normal way of thinking it that is a higher state of ordiliness.
But it is actually disorder.
And of course it is a watertight theory and it all depends on whether it leaks.
Because the alternative is that the big bang is impossible because no contradiction equation can exist.
And if a contradiction equation can't exist.
The the big bang can't happen.
But there is no proof contradiction can't happen for a very short time.
And that is just it contradiction can never happen even for the shortest of times.
And that what I willl argue because of creation ex-nihilo.
If it was not out of contradiction but out of nothing.
That the universe was created then the laws of phyics have always applied.
And that means to be big bang itslef.
There are no meaningless infinites.
They are all rational numbers which can be calculated 2+2=4.
Because if you can add irrational numbers the big bang makes sense.
And if you can't add irrational numbers then the big bang does not make sense.
This is the icing on the cake .
You can prove anything with the law of non contradiction.
And you can prove that both explainations when they are opposites are not right.
And it is clear that one of these explainations is the truth.
And the other a lie.

THE HANDSHAKE EQUATION FOR THE BIG BANG

Dear Josh,
At the same time and the same place there cannot be a deal and a no deal according to contract law.
But a handhske is a geneltemans agreeement not a written contract.
The HANDSHAKE EQUATION FOR THE BIG BANG=
1/3 DEAL+ 1/3 NO DEAL+ 1/2 NO DEAL= 1 HANDSHAKE OR GENTEMANS AGREEMENT.
If you not a gentleman then there is no agreement.
So If you rejectt Heather because her voice is not good enough.
Then there is no agreement that means theres no deal.
Unless you use Heathers voice.

MANHATTAN PROJECT 2-SPLIT THE ATOM AND YOU GET 2

Karl knew I was coming to Sydney Uni for a lecture so he baked a cake.
And he used my recipie.
That is he used meta information and that is what he needed to bake the cake.
And I have a recipe for a pineapple upside down cake and it is Maryannes Coconut cream pi.
And pineapple upside down cake.That means it is two things added together.
And ingredients we need MATH TYPE 6 WIKKAPEDIA AND MATLAB.
And that is simple.
Because we use MATH TYPE 6 to cut and paste a thousand physics equations from Wikkapedia.
And if possible two thousand equations.
And we past those into MATLAB.
And that is simple.
Now for the instructions on how to bake the cake.
GRADUATE ASSISTANT :PLEASE PASS THIS ONTO HAWKING.
MAKE THE PROGRAM FOR HIM SO HE CAN USE IT ON HIS COMPUTER.

Dear grad assistant,
You need to get a programmer to program this way of generating ideas for Stephen Hawking.
It is better than an artificial brian.
Which he doesn't need.
But maybe his own faculties need a helping hand.
And they do.
So what you need are the ingredients MATH TYPE 6 and MATLAB.
And WIKKAPEDIA.
There are thousands of equations on wikkapedia and hundreds of physics equations.
You can cut and paste them into MATLAB.
And when that is done with MATH TYPE 6.
You can then add the equations at random 2+2=4
2 APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4 APPLE/ORANGE.
And that isn't true.
Because 2 ODD+ 2 EVEN= 4 EVEN.
And that is the opposite to 1+1=2.
SO E=MCsquared can be 2+2=4.
When the answer is orange or evens.
But this equation is not the same 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
And 2/3 APPLE+ 2/3 ORANGE+ 2/3 ORANGE= 6/3 APPLE/ORANGE.=4
And if we add this 2+2=4 we get 4 APPLE/ORANGE.
So we can get an answer that is both or just one equation.
We can add 1000 equations from wikkapedia.
1/3 1000+ 1/3 1000+ 1/3 1000= 1 1000.
And divide by 1000 to get one equation of a third.And of course we can do the same with two.
It is not necessary to say that we must add 2000+2000=4000 equations.
Because of course the answer is not the same multiplied.
But we won't get into that.
We we simply reduce by division.
THIS IS ABCASIG ARTFICIAL BRAIN CREATION AS SCIENCE IDEAS GENERATOR.
This is ROBO HAWKING.
And ROBO HAWKING is to replace the real HAWKING.
And he never can.
But Hawking believes robots can replace real physisists.
So he will like ROBO HAWKING.
It can generate any number of new ideas about the theory of everything.
Any thoery string quantum schrodnger fenymann Eddington.
Can all be added on MATLB.
And they will procuce nothing.
And that is like nothing from everything.
Because if you use everything you will get something.
And you may get nothing.
But that is a risk you have to take.
Unless you wanty to be left behind by other physisists.
Because they all are adding equations in one thirds.
Steve A jeffrey

FRED FLINTSTONE CAR.......
RECIPIE FOR THE CAKE.
1/INTERFACE.
2 MATH TYPE 6. CUT AND PASTE EQUATIONS
3.WIKKAPEDIA A THOUSAND PHYSICS EQUATIONS.
4. MATLAB.
5/APPLE G6 DESKTOP SUPERCOMPUTER.
6.PROCESS BOX.
2 APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4 APPLE ORANGE.
1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
Put it togther and what have you got IBBIDITY BOBBETY BOO.

JAVA BIBLE CLOCK

http://www.zshare.net/download/3302920dea80b9/
HERE IS THE PREYANKER BIBLE CLOCK.

NOT SCHRODENGERS CAT

http://www.zshare.net/download/3295874305af65/

EINSTEIN ON TRIAL

Einsteins trial is if relativity is right then you can't add C 2+2=4 isn't that a contradiction Einsetin.?

If Newton sais you can add velocites why do you say you cannot add the speed of light.

Of course you must be able to add it even if it is a hypothetical speed like Pi * speed of light which is also finite.

But does adding it prove Einstein wrong.

What about adding the force of the speed of light and rotational kinetic energy 2+2=4.

But these things make no sense to you.

You are not a scientist you are just a retard.

But any retard knows you can add force.

So you should know that as well.
Why can't we add the four forces 2+2=4 and make Einsteins dream a reality if he is right.

We should be able to.

But for some reason we don't.
We think it is contradictory but if Einsetin was right all the laws of physics were a contradiction in the begining prior to the big bang.

The resulting explosion produced non contradiction.

MECHANISM FOR THE BIG BANG

Dear comarades in arms.I think I have a mechanism for the big bang explosion.And of course there is no big bang or explosion.And that is the mechanism.But in your weakness you would not accept that the rules of physics always apply even to the intital singularity.And maybe it is my weakness because I kind of like the big bang.And it is from a christian perspective that I like it.Because it is the next best thing to ex-nihilo.And the intital blast must have been casued by instability.Because X and Y opposites particles cannot exist in the the same state /space and at the same time/.If they do they are unstable.And they would explode.But just how long can such an arrangement remain stable.That is a question we can answer knowing that it is opposites that casued the explosion Ying and Yang1+1=2=2+2=4.And opposites can equal.And then they no longer equal.And of course this is an excellent bomb.And you have childed me for working on the atomic bomb in the past.But this is the supernature bomb.It would destroy the world or at least part of the galaxy.At least a localised part.Thats a relief.Anyway we should be able to simulate the big bang on computer now.And if it doesn't work.Will you believe ex-nihilo.? Steve.

THE BIG BANG-PINOCCHIO A WOODEN BOY.

The big bang doesn't have any wires.And it does it is a puppet for people who don't want to believe.

And it is not a real boy and not even God can put life into a wooden boy.

Don't believe me as Guastapio.

Because he will tell you that he carved pinocchio fro wood.

So there is no future.

And there is a future without Pinnocchio.

How we even imagine a future without a little wooden boy.

And we have lost nothing because he isn't a real boy.

There is no business like show business.

And that is what Pinnochio is all about.

He is show business.

And show business is pretty convincing.

But it is just for show.

And it doesn't really convince me.

I see contradiction at the begining.

When there were no contradictions.

We everything made sense at the begining.

And really everything does make sense.

At the end.

Because it not really about success.

And it is not really about failure.

It is really about doing what you can.

And not quiting.

Because it is too easy to quit.

When things don't go well.

And often things can go horrendously.

And when they go that bad it is wise to quit.

And it of course never is wise to quit.

And sometimes quiting is the right thing to do.

THE BEGINING- NON CONTADICTION

If the begining is a result of the law of non contradiction.
Then truth is the mechanism for creation.
That means that in the first few seconds of creation the law of physics do not break down.
They can be understood as creation from nothing.
But the seductive nature of contradiction is that at the begining the laws of physics break down.
And this law the law of contradiction applies 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
And of course contradiction is not stable.
So the infinity small superparticle is really all opposites togther both ying and yang.
So of course this is unstable.
So it explodes.
So it reasonable to add equation in a porphory of contradictiary theories.
To get the one state of the particle at the begining which was A AND B as opposites in the same state space and time.
And of course truth says it never happened.
And the myth is that it did

SEVEN DEADLY SINS

The professor on rescue from Gilligans island said : we have had experiences of the same seven deadly sins that have always plaugued mankind(since we have been back in civillization.
Dion's name means Dionysius God of wine women and song.
And his number is 7/7/07 and his birthday is 21.
Is this good or bad no one can live up to Gods number.
So Dion is just like the rest of us he has a mans number.
And is number is 666 not 777.
But if Dions life is to be destroyed by being leader of the world.
And remember Hitler was only a corporal.
His life will be destroyed by the same seven deadly sins that have always plagued mankind.
The right attitude for someone with 777 in his name is to say that he is just as flawaed as everyone else like Kevin Rudd sais.
Civillization is about seven deadly sins unless you are going to live on your own island.
And sin can destroy a life.
God wants us to have an abundant life so he warns us about sin.
And he doesn't warn us about going to catholic church but if it is a substitute for a more real fellowship of believers then it too could be a sin.
Whatever fits your left foot.
Catholics are called left footers.
Going to catholic church on Sunday isn't of value if you drink like a splippery fish.
Because a slippery fish gets off the hook.
I want to believe the best of Dion I can say for sure like me he is meant to be.
I was meant to be concieved at Carnavon George and that place probably adds up to 777 too.
But knowing how flawed Iam 777 is not a guarantee of a good man.
Henry Kissingers name adds up to 666 and he is not reallly a bad man is probably true.

THE MYTHMAKERS AND THE RISKTAKERS.

The myth is Einsteins and he said it thaty there is no inductive method of generating the equations of physics.
And there is one it is John 11:9.
12 LIGHT+ 12 DARKNESS= 24 DARKNESS+LIGHT.
And this would be one the greatest equations that was ever written.
And it written 2 thousand years ago by an intenerant preacher.
Who was not familair with greek Philiosophy.
But he had gone to school and it would take another century before people understood this equation.
Light and Darkeness are two and not one.
And when make them one it is an equation for E=MCsquared.
Because our Jesus equation program proves more about the same thing.
1 ODD+ 1 EVEN= 2 ODD.
And they are light and darkness 1 LIGHT+ 1 DARKNESS= 2 LIGHT.
And of course they are relative that means Light and darkness can be odd or even.
This is what I mean when I say inductive.
We can assume that 2+2=4 produces and answer of darkness.
And 1+1=2 equals and answer of light.
Based on our presuppositions.
But 2+2=4 is 2 DARKNESS+ 2 LIGHT= 4 LIGHT.
and it can be exactly what relativity is all about.
Time is relative for this very reason.
And it is also determined because depending on which way odd and even are arranged we get a determined answer.
We can rult that is always 2+2=4=LIGHT.
And then we will get the answer we expect.
And we might get the exact answer that is correct.
But if that is the wrong way to do it then we will always get the wrong answer.
But if there are always two answers to a thing and they are both right.
That is what the equation really sais.
That it is up to you to decide what light and darkness really is.
And if you make a mistake then how great is that darkness.
In our string thoery of everything (STAR WARS) two rotating discs are joined by a string.
2 ODD FORCE C+ 2 EVEN FORCE C= 4 EVEN FORCE C.
So we can get the force of the one of the discs that is if we use odd and even numbers as algebriac symbols.
But is this right using odd and even as opposites.
It really is right they have been used a opposites for centuries.
And every opposite is like odd and even.
And that is the theory so we get an equation of non contradictiom'We get 1 APPLE+ 1 ORANGE= 2 APPLES.
And 2 APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4 ORANGE.
And that means 2 LIGHT+ 2 DARKNESS= 4 DARKNESS.
Only light and darkness ar eboth even numbers in the Jesus equation.
However we can make them odd.
And we really can change them into an odd number.
Thus an inductive method for E=MCsquared.
Which produces an equation for fission or for fusion.
And not both Because fission is 1+1=2 and fusion is 2+2=4.
And that is induction we know the right way around.
And there is no way to generate all eqautions with 1+1=2 and 2+2=4.
Because we can add all equations using this method.
And get one equation for everthing.
So Einstein is proved wrong about the law of non contradiction.
It is an inductive method of generating all physics equations.

PROGRAM FOR SUPERCOMPUTER

I want an expert on the tarot deck and programming to make the physics tarot. Assemble 52 equations for Time/Space from all physics theories and add them together 2+2=4. A good teacher explains right from wrong. And a BIG TOE TIME ONE EQUATION. Would mean time has one direction at both quantum levels and large scale effects. We would make quantum and relativity have one direction for time times arrow. I want you to add a pack of 52 cards (Graphically represented on computer). With time equations from all kinds of theories on the back. And then I want you to add time equations. 1/3 APPLE+1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 PEAR= 1 APPLE/ORANGE/PEAR. And get one equation for time. By selecting three cards at a time from the pack and adding them togther. And then dividing by 52 to get one equation for time. Steve Close Session.
Adding equations in lots of 52 is the very easiest way to add 2+2=4.
Because you can have two packs of cards and select two cards from each pack.
And that is totally without precedent the best way to teach physics.
Because adding any equation 2+2=4 produces one eqaution for two things.
And of course dviding by four.
Produces one equation for four things.
And tit doesn't make sense to divide an equation that has been added 2+2=4.
And whether it makes sense or not that is how to get one equation.
And of course one equation is three thirds added togther.
Because that is one.
And translatiing 2+2=4 into the green salad equation.
Is what contradiction is all about.
It is very contradcitory for 2+2=4 to equal 1+1=2.
But it is what you need to prove the theory of everything.
So it will work and because it is something you can do that means you should do it.
And that is the law of science.
But contradiction will never solve the problems of physics.
That is why when the equation is two things it is not contradictory.
And that two things can be any two things.
And any two things including the speed of light can be added.
But the answer is hypothetical.
And not when it is the force of the speed of light then the answer is more than just hypothetical.
And of course is just as impossible to add force.
And force of course can always be added.
But the force of the speed of light is very large force.
But it were a very small force it could still be added.
The answer to Pi is to round it off to 3.9999999.
And it might be the answer we are looking for.
And it really is not because Pi repeats but it does not go forever.
And it is .999 and it might be and yet it does not repeat foreverr
If it repeated forever it might reach four if it increased with each repitition.
But it does not increase exponentially.
And there is no way to make it so except by pretending that it does work out.
And this answer that is pretend is very useful for the hypothetical additionof four forces.
Because if Pi did work out to four then we could add four forces and get one.
And maybe that is faith.Faith in the abstraction of twice the speed of light.
But cleary time goes backwards at quantum level and if time went backwards with large scale phenomonon you could unift the large and the small.
1/3 GOOGELPEX+ 1/3 GOOGLEPEX+ 1/3 GOOGLEPLEX= 1 GOOGLEPEX.
And divide by a Googleplex to get Green Salad.
It is is totally sensible to add 1/3 52+ 1/3 52+ 1/3 52= 1 52.
Then you can divide a googleplex into packs of cards.
And you simply can't genetate that many equations and you can by 2+2=4.
You can generate an exponential number of equations.
That will keep your supercomputer forever adding equations.
And If Iam wrong that units can't be added.
1/3 APPLE A DAY+ 1/3 ORANGE A DAY+ 1/3 ORANGE A DAY= 1 APPLE/ORANGE A DAY.
And of course they are time units and if time units are the same we can add any equation.
And get an answer in time.
That is in a few million years.
Because it will take that long to add and apple and orange a day.
Because you need to add one million times 365 days.
And then you have a million days.
And you 365 milion days.
And that is total mess.
Because it totally sensible to divide by 365 million and get an apple/orange a day.
And what we are really doing is adding 365 million apples/oranges.
And they can all be different equatons.
And if you draw the line at adding contradictory equations then the theory of everything just won't work.
But if you don't draw the line it will not work anyway.
Because nothing can make units 1-1 and time can make units 1-1.
So all of the units should be expressed in days.
Then we have to make one day=two.
And we can have a rule that sais all days are equal.
And of course that is the contradiction because all days are equal they are all 24 hour days.
And if If all units are expressed in time they will all have different times.
It is just a matter of expressing them in one day.
And apple a day theory keeps Dr Physics away.
And it works perfectly.
But it does not prove the big bang.
And that is the whole question whether contradiction cna exist at tghe begining of the universe wiothout being created.
And if it can exist what time can contradiction exist for.
\if it is an extremely short time.
Then the instability of YING AND YANG togther means there must be an explosion.
That is unless YING AND YANG CANNOT EXIST TOGTER IN HE SAME STATE AT THE SAME TIME EVEN BRIEFLY.
Then we must consider creation exnihilo because the contradiction is somethikng out of nothing.
Simply because something out of something involves another contradiction.
And if our supercomputer whirrs and make a noise and said cannnnot computer.
I would not be at all suprised if it came up with an absolute answer.
taht teh big bang is impossible.
If it were programmed with the ten laws of non contradiction.
And if they are garbage then you will get garbage out.
But clearly aristotles laws are not garbage.
They fit the universe as it is based on all truth.
So we can expect the truth if we prove contradicton false and non contradcition true.
And if we call everything that is contradcition false.
We are left with no explaination for creation.
And common sense sais contradcition could ahve existed at the begining when the laws of entropy were reversed.
So we can expect contradiction to reverse the laws of entropy.
And that is exactly what contradiction does.
It reverses the direction of lght of the decay of light in terms of energy.
So the mirror cahmber goes along with the laws onf contradiction to come up with a creation equation.
One which must have applied to the big bang.
If that is the way creation happened.
But contradiction could also produce something from nothing.
And that too is contradiction.
So we can get something from something or something from nothing.
And the computer will tell us what the right explaination is.
And it can only tell us that is non contradictory.
Because that is likely if we put God into the equation.
Then something from nothing makes perfect sense.
But something from something that just obeys the laws of physics does not seem to be very likely.
And you will not put contradiction into a computer even if creation ins contradictory.
And you must put it in as false.
If we want a truthful answer.
That means all truth lies in non contraication.
And that is a good hypothesis otherwise science cannot solve the problem of creation and get a non contradictory answer.
So the answer is opposite particles X and Y cannnot exist in the same state and the same time.
And the other answer which must be true or false is they can exist briefly in the state and be unstable and explode.
The computer will never decide one is non contradictory.
And it might go for solution 1 since this is the law of non contradiction.
Solution 2 means the DALI LAMA EQUATION IS RIGHT.
GOD CAN BE ONE WITH EVERYTHING.
And the alterntive is GOD IS WHO HE IS AND CREATION IS NOT LIKE HIM IN IT:S NATURE.
And that is common sense that infnity does not apply to finite creation.

TEN LAWS OF CREATION SCIENCE

The Little red schoolbook: How to take a holiday(break) from college evolutionary teaching
Four spiritual laws of creation science
1/There are a million and one reasons to believe evolution.
2/There are a million reasons to believe creation.
3/You have to choose the million reasons to believe creation.
4/ You have to WANT TO BELIEVE CREATION.
Five laws of the scientific method…………
1/ Creation is a science not just a religion.
2/ Evolution is a religion not just a science.
3/ There is scientific evidence that supports creation as well as scientific evidence that supports evolution.
4/ Intelligent design is an empirical science not a religion.
(The bible is left at home.)
5/People ought to know what they believe and the reasons why and what they do not believe and the reasons why not.
10/ EVERYONE KNOWS THE CLAIM THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT CREATION IS FALSE.
THE HOLY SPIRIT AND THE BLUE TONGUE SKINK.
The Holy Spirit is like a blue tongue skink that lives in a spiders burrow.
The blue tongue skink eats the spider in it’s palace and sits on it’s throne to become king of the palace.The palace is the human soul.
And the Holy Spirit is the King of the Human Soul.
You need to get the wrong man out (spiderman) and the right man in (jesus).
A thief pleaded not guilty to stealing even though he admitted that the video showing him take the watch out of the handbag looked bad.
We are all like that theif we plead not guilty to breaking the ten commandments but the evidence is against us.We need to plead guilty and then Christ the just judge will exhonerate us.
CREATE AN INTEREST IN THE GOSPEL CATAGORY......EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT................
Appedix to the ten laws some of the scientific evidence for and against evolution.
Four reasons to believe theistic evolution.
1/ Proper science proves the world began with a big bang 3.5 million years ago.
2/The speed of light bieng a constant and the distance of the stars prove there was time enough for evolution.
3/Chance is a process controlled by laws of chaos theory.
Chaos theory means there is order in randomness created by God.
4/Evolution is the mechanism God used to create.
Four reasons to believe creation science.
1/The lack of intermediate forms in the fossil record.Darwin said this proves him wrong.
2/The earth is too young for evolution.
One example is the rotation of the earth is being slowed by the moon it has not slowed enough for the earth to be old.
3.Monkeys have 99% of human genes but so does a banana so similarity doesn't prove anything.
4/Geology does not admit into evidence a worldwide flood.
Since the flood is an historical event recorded by all people groups uniformatarian geology must be wrong if it excludes it.
Four reasons to believe in ID.
1/Irriducible complexity example the flagella like a mousetrap it cannot work without all of it's parts.
2/A watch found in a field can be assumed to have a designer.
3/The Greek Philosophy of ID is opposite to the philosophy of the atomists which led to atomic theory.
Both theories are scientific and empirical and do not depend on interpreting the bible or other religious books.
Note:Tradition isn't all bad.
Because of our traditions every one knows who he is and what God expects him to be

THE JESUS ANTHOLOGY-SUPERMAX

STRING THEORIES ARE RIDICULOUS 4#

This is what einstein wrote on his last blackborad.

Well it could have been.

No one knows for sure.

I know Einsteins blog it is my blog about Einstein.

And Pi is 4.

And it is 39/11. So is 3.545.

And that is a solution that Einstein would be very happy with because it is the mean of Pi.

I can get it to work out but is that what it is all about.

If the mean doesn't work out then an answer that works out may not be right.And it is one solution.And of course there are multiple solutions of Pi there is more than one possible solution.

And there is one solution which is correct.

And that is the theory of non contradiction.All the other solutions are wrong.

And that is really good.It means we can draw the graph of the one solution that works and every other solution that does not work.

And that is positive it is positivisim.And is it is that was positivism is all about or is any solution acceptable in positivism.

And hawking is a positivist that means he tolerates contradiction.

Black holes can emit energy and swallow all energy at the same time.

And of course they can't.

So hakwing should not get the nobel prize for physics because there isn't one.

And if there is one he should probably get it because it is impossible for there to be one when there isn't.

But things could change and the rules regarding black holes do not change.

And they have changed and of course they cannot.

10 LAWS OF NON CONTRADICTION-AGREED VALUE

The big bang theory of everything is rpoved wrong by the law of non contradiction.
1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is an equation for making equations one with everything.
But it is false because Two opposite particles X and Y YING AND YANG cannot be in the same state at the same time.
Here are ten laws of non contradiction.
1/ Contradictions entail everything.
2/Contradictions can't be true.
3/ Contradictions can't be believed rationality.
4/If contradictions were acceptable people could never be rationally critisized.
5/If contradictions were acceptable no one could deny anything.Like Peter denied.
6/ All units have to have an equal value for a theory of everything equation and a 1-1 correspondance.
Or an agreed value between pesos and dollars.
7/ Two opposite particles X and Y cannot be in the same state at the same time.
8/You can add apples to apples and oranges to oranges And that is not contradiction.But you can't add apples to oranges.
9/What are apples what are not contradictory equations.
10.You can't add 2+2=4.And of course you can add 2+2=4 and that is not a contradiction.

THE TRUTH ABOVE CAM.
THE TRUTH ABOUT HAMLET WITHOUT THE PRINCE THE BIG BANG WITHOUT JESUS.
TEN LAWS OF NON CONTRADICTION.
THEY WERE MEANT TO BE CAM PRINT THEM AS A TRACT................
Francis Shaffer said the law of non contradiction is the basis for all truth and all rationality.
Steve.

My creativity equation must not contradict the Laws of non contradiction can you use your supercomputer to test why it does obey the laws of on contradiction.Clue there are no large or small units in infinity.
And a horse by any other unit is still a horse.

THE REPEATING VALUE OF PI

THE MAN WHO WORKED OUT PI-THE BIBLE VALUE. STEPHEN A JEFFREY.
22/7*4/3.99999=3.142865. Pi to six digits.
22/7*4=12.57142857.
360 days/7=51.42857143.
51.42857143/12.57142857=4.090909091./4=1.022727273 weeks*51=52.15909092.
*7=365.1136364.days.
SQUARE ROOT OF PI/SQUARE ROOT OF 3.142865.=1.772453851/1.772810481=.999798833.
PHI=PI+1 PI-1
2.141793821.
4.141391487.
The earths orbit is not a circle but an elipse.Use matlab and my forumla to convert a circluar orbit to an elipse and backwards.
The difference should give you the six digit value for pi.
An irrational value for pi doesn't work.
365.2422-52.15909092=.01283143*24*60=18.4772592/3=5.543183303
5.543183301+5.543183303+5.5433183303=18.4772592
Infinite 666. 1/3 18.4772592+ 1/3 18.4772592+ 1/3 18.4772592=3/3=1

360/7=51.42857143/12.57146=4.0908988864/4=1.022724716*51=52.15896051*7=365.1127236*24=8,762.705366*60*60=31,545,739.32=5.867507513 *10 to the 12. km in a light year* 45,000000000000=2.640378381*10 ^26 Km/Light year Size of theuniverse.Radius.
.30795432 of day difference gives you 18.
But I have made a mistake the value of 18 minutess difference is wrong.But it is the value that gives you infinite 6666.
365.2425(greogrian calander)-365.1127236=.01297764*24*60=18.687016=6.2292672+6.2292672+6.2292672.
Adds up to 36+36+36=108=18*6. But this is the value for 666.The correct vlaue is.1297764.
So it is 10* 18 Minutes./3=666.

Dear Karen,
The credit for working out Pi belongs to my fx-100-AU CASIO.
C*1.42865*C*3.142865.
186,000m/s*3.142865*186000*3.142865=3.417254637 * 10^11.
Of course this value for Pi is different because it works out.
/PI=1.087745935*10 to the 11th.SO PI works out to 10 to the 11th places exactly.
Stephen Author of Genesis 2#- How to Fail at Telling a creation myth.
Steve
Dear Andrew Lamb
PI*186000m/second*PI*186,000m/second=3.414488339*10^11.
3.142865*186,000*3.142865*186,000=3.417254637*10^11
22/7*186000* 22/7*186,000=3.417237551*10^11.
Divide the two values for PI *10^11 and you should get 1.
It is as close to 1 as you can possibly imagine.
And the difference gives you the difference between finite PI(works out) and infinite PI which doesn't work out.
But both finite and infinite pi work out when multiplied by C squared.
This is an amazing fact and a miracle that God has built into the universe to show design.
Put this vaue into a supercomputer and use the finite value of Pi to the 10^11 instead of infinity.
As infinite m/second.Put this into the WASP supercomputer in Western Australia.
STEVE A JEFFREY
(.9999999/4*3.99999)*(22/7*4/3.99999)= 3.142857111.
With a Casio fx AU 100 Supercalculator.
Answer with windows calculator 3.1428571397142857142867142857143.
Take it to 10,000 digits and look at repeating Pi.
39/11=3.54545454545.
Time, The Fourth Dimension
We live in a world of three dimensions. Well, we only perceive three dimensions. We can hypothesize many more dimensions. But, they are difficult to imagine.
Because of Einstein, we often call time the fourth dimension. Special relativity shows that time behaves surprisingly like the three spatial dimensions. The Lorenz equations show this. Length contracts as speed increases. Time expands as speed increases.
Scientists have been graphing time, as if it were a length, for hundreds of years. To the left is a typical graph, showing two things in motion at the same speed, one to the left and one to the right. Time never behaves exactly like a spatial dimension. You cannot go backward in time. And you normally cannot go forward at different rates. But, there are surprising parallels. For some purposes, it is handy to call time a fourth dimension. For other purposes
Pretend, for a moment, that there are more than three spatial dimensions. What is a four or five-dimensional cube like? It is hard to visualize. But, we can make a few deductions about such an object. What if a 5-dimensional cube is 2 centimeters on a side, what is its 5-dimensional volume? Well, we can easily generalize from the first three dimensions. A 2x2 square is 4 (2x2) square centimeters in area. A 2x2x2 cube is 8 (2x2x2) cubic centimeters in volume. A 2x2x2x2x2 5-dimensional cube is 32 centimeters-to-the-5th-power in 5-dimensional volume. None of that can be visualized. But, it makes sense. What is the distance between two points in 5-space? You can easily deduce a 5-dimensional Pythagorean Theorem.
History of Pi
A little known verse of the Bible reads
And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it about.
The same verse can be found in II Chronicles 4, 2. It occurs in a list of specifications for the great temple of Solomon, built around 950 BC and its interest here is that it gives π = 3. Not a very accurate value of course and not even very accurate in its day, for the Egyptian and Mesopotamian values of 25/8 = 3.125 and √10 = 3.162 have been traced to much earlier dates: though in defence of Solomon's craftsmen it should be noted that the item being described seems to have been a very large brass casting, where a high degree of geometrical precision is neither possible nor necessary. There are some interpretations of this which lead to a much better value.
The fact that the ratio of the circumference to the diameter of a circle is constant has been known for so long that it is quite untraceable. The earliest values of π including the 'Biblical' value of 3, were almost certainly found by measurement. In the Egyptian Rhind Papyrus, which is dated about 1650 BC, there is good evidence for 4 (8/9)2 = 3.16 as a value for π.
The first theoretical calculation seems to have been carried out by Archimedes of Syracuse (287-212 BC). He obtained the approximation
223/71 < π < 22/7.
Before giving an indication of his proof, notice that very considerable sophistication involved in the use of inequalities here. Archimedes knew, what so many people to this day do not, that π does not equal 22/7, and made no claim to have discovered the exact value. If we take his best estimate as the average of his two bounds we obtain 3.1418, an error of about 0.0002.
Here is Archimedes' argument.
Consider a circle of radius 1, in which we inscribe a regular polygon of 3 2n-1 sides, with semiperimeter bn, and superscribe a regular polygon of 3 2n-1 sides, with semiperimeter an.
The diagram for the case n = 2 is on the right.
The effect of this procedure is to define an increasing sequence
b1 , b2 , b3 , ...
and a decreasing sequence
a1 , a2 , a3 , ...
such that both sequences have limit π.
Using trigonometrical notation, we see that the two semiperimeters are given by
an = K tan(π/K), bn = K sin(π/K),
where K = 3 2n-1. Equally, we have
an+1 = 2K tan(π/2K), bn+1 = 2K sin(π/2K),
and it is not a difficult exercise in trigonometry to show that
(1/an + 1/bn) = 2/an+1 . . . (1)
an+1bn = (bn+1)2 . . . (2)
Archimedes, starting from a1 = 3 tan(π/3) = 3√3 and b1 = 3 sin(π/3) = 3√3/2, calculated a2 using (1), then b2 using (2), then a3 using (1), then b3 using (2), and so on until he had calculated a6 and b6. His conclusion was that
b6 < π < a6 .
It is important to realise that the use of trigonometry here is unhistorical: Archimedes did not have the advantage of an algebraic and trigonometrical notation and had to derive (1) and (2) by purely geometrical means. Moreover he did not even have the advantage of our decimal notation for numbers, so that the calculation of a6 and b6 from (1) and (2) was by no means a trivial task. So it was a pretty stupendous feat both of imagination and of calculation and the wonder is not that he stopped with polygons of 96 sides, but that he went so far.
For of course there is no reason in principle why one should not go on. Various people did, including:

Ptolemy
(c. 150 AD)
3.1416
Zu Chongzhi
(430-501 AD)
355/113
al-Khwarizmi
(c. 800 )
3.1416
al-Kashi
(c. 1430)
14 places
Viète
(1540-1603)
9 places
Roomen
(1561-1615)
17 places
Van Ceulen
(c. 1600)
35 places
Except for Zu Chongzhi, about whom next to nothing is known and who is very unlikely to have known about Archimedes' work, there was no theoretical progress involved in these improvements, only greater stamina in calculation. Notice how the lead, in this as in all scientific matters, passed from Europe to the East for the millennium 400 to 1400 AD.
Al-Khwarizmi lived in Baghdad, and incidentally gave his name to 'algorithm', while the words al jabr in the title of one of his books gave us the word 'algebra'. Al-Kashi lived still further east, in Samarkand, while Zu Chongzhi, one need hardly add, lived in China.
The European Renaissance brought about in due course a whole new mathematical world. Among the first effects of this reawakening was the emergence of mathematical formulae for π. One of the earliest was that of Wallis (1616-1703)
2/π = (1.3.3.5.5.7. ...)/(2.2.4.4.6.6. ...)
and one of the best-known is
π/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + ....
This formula is sometimes attributed to Leibniz (1646-1716) but is seems to have been first discovered by James Gregory (1638- 1675).
These are both dramatic and astonishing formulae, for the expressions on the right are completely arithmetical in character, while π arises in the first instance from geometry. They show the surprising results that infinite processes can achieve and point the way to the wonderful richness of modern mathematics.
From the point of view of the calculation of π, however, neither is of any use at all. In Gregory's series, for example, to get 4 decimal places correct we require the error to be less than 0.00005 = 1/20000, and so we need about 10000 terms of the series. However, Gregory also showed the more general result
tan-1 x = x - x3/3 + x5/5 - ... (-1 x 1) . . . (3)
from which the first series results if we put x = 1. So using the fact that
tan-1(1/√3) = π/6 we get
π/6 = (1/√3)(1 - 1/(3.3) + 1/(5.3.3) - 1/(7.3.3.3) + ...
which converges much more quickly. The 10th term is 1/(19 39√3), which is less than 0.00005, and so we have at least 4 places correct after just 9 terms.
An even better idea is to take the formula
π/4 = tan-1(1/2) + tan-1(1/3) . . . (4)
and then calculate the two series obtained by putting first 1/2 and the 1/3 into (3).
Clearly we shall get very rapid convergence indeed if we can find a formula something like
π/4 = tan-1(1/a) + tan-1(1/b)
with a and b large. In 1706 Machin found such a formula:
π/4 = 4 tan-1(1/5) - tan-1(1/239) . . . (5)
Actually this is not at all hard to prove, if you know how to prove (4) then there is no real extra difficulty about (5), except that the arithmetic is worse. Thinking it up in the first place is, of course, quite another matter.
With a formula like this available the only difficulty in computing π is the sheer boredom of continuing the calculation. Needless to say, a few people were silly enough to devote vast amounts of time and effort to this tedious and wholly useless pursuit. One of them, an Englishman named Shanks, used Machin's formula to calculate π to 707 places, publishing the results of many years of labour in 1873. Shanks has achieved immortality for a very curious reason which we shall explain in a moment.Here is a summary of how the improvement went:
1699:
Sharp used Gregory's result to get 71 correct digits
1701:
Machin used an improvement to get 100 digits and the following used his methods:
1719:
de Lagny found 112 correct digits
1789:
Vega got 126 places and in 1794 got 136
1841:
Rutherford calculated 152 digits and in 1853 got 440
1873:
Shanks calculated 707 places of which 527 were correct
A more detailed Chronology is available.
Shanks knew that π was irrational since this had been proved in 1761 by Lambert. Shortly after Shanks' calculation it was shown by Lindemann that π is transcendental, that is, π is not the solution of any polynomial equation with integer coefficients. In fact this result of Lindemann showed that 'squaring the circle' is impossible. The transcendentality of π implies that there is no ruler and compass construction to construct a square equal in area to a given circle.
Very soon after Shanks' calculation a curious statistical freak was noticed by De Morgan, who found that in the last of 707 digits there was a suspicious shortage of 7's. He mentions this in his Budget of Paradoxes of 1872 and a curiosity it remained until 1945 when Ferguson discovered that Shanks had made an error in the 528th place, after which all his digits were wrong. In 1949 a computer was used to calculate π to 2000 places. In this and all subsequent computer expansions the number of 7's does not differ significantly from its expectation, and indeed the sequence of digits has so far passed all statistical tests for randomness.You can see 2000 places of π.We should say a little of how the notation π arose. Oughtred in 1647 used the symbol d/π for the ratio of the diameter of a circle to its circumference. David Gregory (1697) used π/r for the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its radius. The first to use π with its present meaning was an Welsh mathematician William Jones in 1706 when he states "3.14159 andc. = π". Euler adopted the symbol in 1737 and it quickly became a standard notation.
We conclude with one further statistical curiosity about the calculation of π, namely Buffon's needle experiment. If we have a uniform grid of parallel lines, unit distance apart and if we drop a needle of length k < 1 on the grid, the probability that the needle falls across a line is 2k/π. Various people have tried to calculate π by throwing needles. The most remarkable result was that of Lazzerini (1901), who made 34080 tosses and got
π = 355/113 = 3.1415929
which, incidentally, is the value found by Zu Chongzhi. This outcome is suspiciously good, and the game is given away by the strange number 34080 of tosses. Kendall and Moran comment that a good value can be obtained by stopping the experiment at an optimal moment. If you set in advance how many throws there are to be then this is a very inaccurate way of computing π. Kendall and Moran comment that you would do better to cut out a large circle of wood and use a tape measure to find its circumference and diameter.
Still on the theme of phoney experiments, Gridgeman, in a paper which pours scorn on Lazzerini and others, created some amusement by using a needle of carefully chosen length k = 0.7857, throwing it twice, and hitting a line once. His estimate for π was thus given by
2 0.7857 / π = 1/2
from which he got the highly creditable value of π = 3.1428. He was not being serious!
It is almost unbelievable that a definition of π was used, at least as an excuse, for a racial attack on the eminent mathematici Landau's in 1934. had def Landau's ined π in this textbook published in Göttingen in that year by the, now fairly usual, method of saying that π/2 is the value of x between 1 and 2 for which cos x vanishes. This unleashed an academic dispute which was to end in dismissal Landau's from his chair at Göttingen. Bieberbachan eminent number theorist who disgraced himself by his racist views, explains the reasons for Landau's dismissal:-
Thus the valiant rejection by the Göttingen student body which a great mathematician, , has experienced is due in the final analysis to the fact that the un-German style of this man in his research and teaching is unbearable to German feelings. A people who have perceived how members of another race are working to impose ideas foreign to its own must refuse teachers of an alien culture.
G H Hardy replied immediately to Bieberbachch in a published note about the consequences of this un-German definition of π
There are many of us, many Englishmen and many Germans, who said things during the War which we scarcely meant and are sorry to remember now. Anxiety for one's own position, dread of falling behind the rising torrent of folly, determination at all cost not to be outdone, may be natural if not particularly heroic excuses. Professor Bieberbach's reputation excludes such explanations of his utterances, and I find myself driven to the more uncharitable conclusion that he really believes them true.
Not only in Germany did π present problems. In the USA the value of π gave rise to heated political debate. In the State of Indiana in 1897 the House of Representatives unanimously passed a Bill introducing a new mathematical truth.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana: It has been found that a circular area is to the square on a line equal to the quadrant of the circumference, as the area of an equilateral rectangle is to the square of one side.
The Senate of Indiana showed a little more sense and postponed indefinitely the adoption of the Act!
Intensity of radio echoes reflected on surface of a meteoric plasma column
Shimizu Minoru
1.IntroductionWhen plasma frequency in the meteoric trail is higher than frequency of incoming VHF radio waves,the plasma can reflect radio waves like a mirror.And this reflected radio waves is observed as meteoric overdense echo.As radius of the meteoric trail is about tens meter,the same order of wave length of the VHF radio wave,I think the reflection is thought to be scattering of waves. Thereby, I made simulation about radio wave reflection on the meteoric plasma on the basis of wave theory.2.Basis of the simulationAs well-known, Maxwell's equation describes electromagnetic waves in the space. In this simulation radio echo is supposed to be overdense echo, thereby no electric field is being in the meteoric plasma and electric field composed of incoming and reflected radio wave is vertical to the surface of the plasma.This is also the boundary condition for differential equation in this simulation.(1)Topological form of the meteoric plasma and used coordination for this simulation .In this simulation,meteoric plasma has cylindrical form having radius r0, its axis is parallel to z axis of cylindrical coordination.Here note that in cylindrical coordination r means and means arctan(y/x).(2)Radio waveLetting k denoting k wave number projected on x-y plane and kz denoting z component of the wave number.The radio wave has frequency and linearly polarized to have electric fields E on x-z plane.The Maxwell's equation in these condition ishere,c means light speed in the vacuum and E means z component of electric field E.Now,considering plane radio wave Ei travelling to x direction.Where , and wave length This plane radio wave satisfies the Maxwell's equation, and this wave represents incoming wave to the meteoric plasma column.The following radio wave Er represents reflected radio wave by the meteoric column because asymptotic form of the wave represents outwardly spreading wave.And this wave satisfies Lapace equation as shown below in cylindrical coordination,i.e one of the solutions of the Maxwell's equation.Where (3)Boundary conditionSince electric field E polarized in x-z plane,the component of the electric field parallel to the surface of the plasma column is should be zero on the surface of the column because the plasma is supposed to be conductive material.Therefore, following condition should be satisfied on the surface of the meteoric column.(4)Reflected wave formThis boundary condition demands following equation for a0 and an.By introducing these a0 and an into formula of Er, reflected wave is completely described.The amplitude of reflected radio wave with angle by the column, and having radius of r0, isFollowing figure shows calculated Intensity of the echo depending r0 of the column and reflected angle .
3.ConsiderationIntensity of the echo doesn't proportion to the radius of the meteoric plasma column because of refraction around the column for incoming radio waves .And the echo also has asymmetric reflection intensity distribution on reflection angle .I guess these evidences give hints about time dependent intensity variation for overdense echoes.The radius of the plasma column spreads because of diffusion in upper atmosphere,and it sometimes make slow fading on the intensity of the echoes,especially radius of the column is the values of zero points of Bessel functions divided by k.
Mean Median and the Mode of PI.
39/11=3.545454545.Sunday, February 21, 2010
JEFFREYS THEORY OF EVERYTHING

My theory of everything for WASP..
Steve Jeffreys collary to the law of non contradiction.
Opposite particles X and Y cannot be in the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME in the SAME PLACE THE EXCEPTION PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG...
FOUR STATES ARE ONE PRIOR TO THE BIG BANG AND THE FOUR FORCES DEPEND ON THE FOUR STATES SO THEY ARE ALSO ONE.
E=MC^2 depends on momentum an momentum is determined by state.
This is a means for a Big crunch to store the potential energy of a prexisting universe and release it as Kinetic energy in the big bang.
The mechanism is super critical non newtoinan fluids or four states of matter in one.....................
This give you a mechanism for the big bang you can use WASP To calculate the potential energy of the prexisting universe and the kinetic energy of the big bang.
You asked me to give you a thoery it is simplified it does not include determinism.
Determinism in the early universe maks it too complicated.Suffice to say qantum effects did not kick in until after the Big Bang everything prior to that was determinism rather than randomness.
The reason being is as you go back in time order or reverse entropy increases and becomes infinite.
I can argue there is no need for God but I don't want to.
And that is the characteristic of every true believer they want to believe.
Steve.

The universal energy equation is 2+2=4 Over a cycle the big bang and the big crunch have to balance 2+2=4.
But due to thermodynamics a little energy is lost with each cycle like a bouncing ball.
And to balance 2+2 so that it equals four we have to increase mass as it goes backward in time.
So that with infinite time we have infinite mass.Which EInstein said was a dealbreaker.............
Infinite mass is an impossibility.
And since it is the only way to make 2+2=4 balance.
Then there is another way that is for energy to be fetched like a bucket of water from dimension X nihilo.
Creative energy is fetched from ex-nihilo making the big bang balance for the universal energy equation 2+2=4.

Einsteins second equation for mass approaching the speed of light includes momentum.
And momentum is determined by state so when four states are one E=MC^2 is a different equation for prior to the big bang.
Posted by STEVE at 12:58 AM