PROGRAM FOR SUPERCOMPUTER

I want an expert on the tarot deck and programming to make the physics tarot. Assemble 52 equations for Time/Space from all physics theories and add them together 2+2=4. A good teacher explains right from wrong. And a BIG TOE TIME ONE EQUATION. Would mean time has one direction at both quantum levels and large scale effects. We would make quantum and relativity have one direction for time times arrow. I want you to add a pack of 52 cards (Graphically represented on computer). With time equations from all kinds of theories on the back. And then I want you to add time equations. 1/3 APPLE+1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 PEAR= 1 APPLE/ORANGE/PEAR. And get one equation for time. By selecting three cards at a time from the pack and adding them togther. And then dividing by 52 to get one equation for time. Steve Close Session.
Adding equations in lots of 52 is the very easiest way to add 2+2=4.
Because you can have two packs of cards and select two cards from each pack.
And that is totally without precedent the best way to teach physics.
Because adding any equation 2+2=4 produces one eqaution for two things.
And of course dviding by four.
Produces one equation for four things.
And tit doesn't make sense to divide an equation that has been added 2+2=4.
And whether it makes sense or not that is how to get one equation.
And of course one equation is three thirds added togther.
Because that is one.
And translatiing 2+2=4 into the green salad equation.
Is what contradiction is all about.
It is very contradcitory for 2+2=4 to equal 1+1=2.
But it is what you need to prove the theory of everything.
So it will work and because it is something you can do that means you should do it.
And that is the law of science.
But contradiction will never solve the problems of physics.
That is why when the equation is two things it is not contradictory.
And that two things can be any two things.
And any two things including the speed of light can be added.
But the answer is hypothetical.
And not when it is the force of the speed of light then the answer is more than just hypothetical.
And of course is just as impossible to add force.
And force of course can always be added.
But the force of the speed of light is very large force.
But it were a very small force it could still be added.
The answer to Pi is to round it off to 3.9999999.
And it might be the answer we are looking for.
And it really is not because Pi repeats but it does not go forever.
And it is .999 and it might be and yet it does not repeat foreverr
If it repeated forever it might reach four if it increased with each repitition.
But it does not increase exponentially.
And there is no way to make it so except by pretending that it does work out.
And this answer that is pretend is very useful for the hypothetical additionof four forces.
Because if Pi did work out to four then we could add four forces and get one.
And maybe that is faith.Faith in the abstraction of twice the speed of light.
But cleary time goes backwards at quantum level and if time went backwards with large scale phenomonon you could unift the large and the small.
1/3 GOOGELPEX+ 1/3 GOOGLEPEX+ 1/3 GOOGLEPLEX= 1 GOOGLEPEX.
And divide by a Googleplex to get Green Salad.
It is is totally sensible to add 1/3 52+ 1/3 52+ 1/3 52= 1 52.
Then you can divide a googleplex into packs of cards.
And you simply can't genetate that many equations and you can by 2+2=4.
You can generate an exponential number of equations.
That will keep your supercomputer forever adding equations.
And If Iam wrong that units can't be added.
1/3 APPLE A DAY+ 1/3 ORANGE A DAY+ 1/3 ORANGE A DAY= 1 APPLE/ORANGE A DAY.
And of course they are time units and if time units are the same we can add any equation.
And get an answer in time.
That is in a few million years.
Because it will take that long to add and apple and orange a day.
Because you need to add one million times 365 days.
And then you have a million days.
And you 365 milion days.
And that is total mess.
Because it totally sensible to divide by 365 million and get an apple/orange a day.
And what we are really doing is adding 365 million apples/oranges.
And they can all be different equatons.
And if you draw the line at adding contradictory equations then the theory of everything just won't work.
But if you don't draw the line it will not work anyway.
Because nothing can make units 1-1 and time can make units 1-1.
So all of the units should be expressed in days.
Then we have to make one day=two.
And we can have a rule that sais all days are equal.
And of course that is the contradiction because all days are equal they are all 24 hour days.
And if If all units are expressed in time they will all have different times.
It is just a matter of expressing them in one day.
And apple a day theory keeps Dr Physics away.
And it works perfectly.
But it does not prove the big bang.
And that is the whole question whether contradiction cna exist at tghe begining of the universe wiothout being created.
And if it can exist what time can contradiction exist for.
\if it is an extremely short time.
Then the instability of YING AND YANG togther means there must be an explosion.
That is unless YING AND YANG CANNOT EXIST TOGTER IN HE SAME STATE AT THE SAME TIME EVEN BRIEFLY.
Then we must consider creation exnihilo because the contradiction is somethikng out of nothing.
Simply because something out of something involves another contradiction.
And if our supercomputer whirrs and make a noise and said cannnnot computer.
I would not be at all suprised if it came up with an absolute answer.
taht teh big bang is impossible.
If it were programmed with the ten laws of non contradiction.
And if they are garbage then you will get garbage out.
But clearly aristotles laws are not garbage.
They fit the universe as it is based on all truth.
So we can expect the truth if we prove contradicton false and non contradcition true.
And if we call everything that is contradcition false.
We are left with no explaination for creation.
And common sense sais contradcition could ahve existed at the begining when the laws of entropy were reversed.
So we can expect contradiction to reverse the laws of entropy.
And that is exactly what contradiction does.
It reverses the direction of lght of the decay of light in terms of energy.
So the mirror cahmber goes along with the laws onf contradiction to come up with a creation equation.
One which must have applied to the big bang.
If that is the way creation happened.
But contradiction could also produce something from nothing.
And that too is contradiction.
So we can get something from something or something from nothing.
And the computer will tell us what the right explaination is.
And it can only tell us that is non contradictory.
Because that is likely if we put God into the equation.
Then something from nothing makes perfect sense.
But something from something that just obeys the laws of physics does not seem to be very likely.
And you will not put contradiction into a computer even if creation ins contradictory.
And you must put it in as false.
If we want a truthful answer.
That means all truth lies in non contraication.
And that is a good hypothesis otherwise science cannot solve the problem of creation and get a non contradictory answer.
So the answer is opposite particles X and Y cannnot exist in the same state and the same time.
And the other answer which must be true or false is they can exist briefly in the state and be unstable and explode.
The computer will never decide one is non contradictory.
And it might go for solution 1 since this is the law of non contradiction.
Solution 2 means the DALI LAMA EQUATION IS RIGHT.
GOD CAN BE ONE WITH EVERYTHING.
And the alterntive is GOD IS WHO HE IS AND CREATION IS NOT LIKE HIM IN IT:S NATURE.
And that is common sense that infnity does not apply to finite creation.